What doth it profit a man to attend Latin Masses, but not live like the Good Samaritan?
Email: torontocatholicwitness@outlook.com

Friday, 4 March 2016

Bishop Fred Henry on Totalitarianism: "The government is engaged in social re-engineering, imposing an ideology and indoctrinating children..."

Bishop Fred Henry has just published a third Pastoral Letter on March 1, 2016 condemning the totalitarian putsch by the Government of Alberta against school children and their parents, regarding the attempted imposition of gender ideology in Catholic Schools. His Letter needs to be studied and distributed far and wide amongst Catholics, Christians, and all men and women of good will. 

His Excellency wrote: 

A sure sign that spring is near, according to Parks Canada, is the sight of the first grizzly bear of the season coming out of winter hibernation.

As this natural process unfolds, it is an apt time to review the recommended bear safety tips for people visiting mountain parks: ensure pets are on a leash while out walking; travel in groups and make noise; and have bear spray within reach and know how to use it. The number one safety tip is "Knowing how to reduce an encounter before it happens as that is good for people and good for bears."This latter safety tip would also make good sense in politics. Probably, the worst thing you could do would be to poke and prod a hibernating bear, or the majority of the population, especially parents and educators, with a stick.

Alas, the Guidelines for Best Practice re: Diverse Sexual Orientations, Gender Identities and Gender Expressions from the Ministry of Education do precisely that. The stick or underlying principle is "Self-identification is the sole measure of an individual's sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression. "This is simply not congruent with Catholic teaching on human sexuality. Gender identity is determined at conception, genetically, anatomically and chromosomally.

The Ministry's underlying principle leads to a subset of so-called "best practices," for example: 

"No student or family should be referred to programs which purport to 'fix,'change' or 'repair' a student's sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression." p5

"Some individuals may not feel included in the use of the pronouns "he" or "she" and may prefer alternate pronouns, such as "ze," "zir," "hir," "they" or "them," or might wish to express themselves or self-identify in other ways (e.g., MX. instead or Mr., Mrs., Ms., or Miss, or no prefix at all)." p5

"School forms, websites, letters, and other communications use non-gendered and inclusive language (e.g., parents/guardians, caregivers, families, partners, "student" or "their" instead of Mr., Ms., Mrs., mother, father, him, her, etc.)." p4

"If a human sexuality class is organized by gender, students are able to choose which class they participate in." p8

"Students with diverse sexual orientations, gender identities and gender expressions have a right to accommodation when it comes to the use of washroom and change room facilities that are congruent with their gender identity. This applies during school time and school-related activities on and off school property (such as field trips and athletic events)." p9

If your premise is incorrect, in all likelihood, your conclusions will also be invalid. It doesn't help when the Ministry double-downs with comments such as "But that protection (religious) has never allowed faith-based edicts to compromise the letter of the law." The Guidelines do not have the force of law. They are suggestions, and not very good ones either. 

A much more interesting and relevant question is what should be done if a law is seriously and fundamentally flawed? For example, Bill 10, in effect, empowers a 12 year old (theoretically), whom society doesn't consider mature enough to get a driver's licence or to vote, to establish education policy without parental involvement, the elected trustees approval and even contrary to the experienced direction of a master teacher or principal. That's simply absurd and it would be immoral to follow such legislation.

Furthermore, all Canadians, including the Ministry of Education, must also be in compliance with the law which goes well beyond Bill 1 0. The doctrine that Catholic schools are entitled to permeate Catholicity, Catholic teaching and Catholic dogma in all aspects of its curriculum has been specifically recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada in Hirsch (1926), Greater Hull (1984), Greater Montreal (1989), Mahe (1990), and Loyola (2015). 

However, this is not just a Catholic issue but a parental issue. The government is engaged in social re-engineering, imposing an ideology and indoctrinating children without parental consultation, input and support.

In conclusion, I would offer this advice to the Minister of Education: If you encounter a bear on the trail, or in your campsite, stop what you are doing and evaluate the situation. Identify yourself by speaking in a calm, appeasing tone. Back away slowly, preferably in the direction you came. Walk, don't run, and keep your eye on the bear so you can see how it will react. In most cases, the bear will flee - unless it perceives that its cubs are at risk. In that case, .... pray!


Anonymous said...

Pray for this bishop and all of our bishops!

Mal said...

This Canadian PM reminds me of Nero and other Roman emperors who believed they were gods. They had their downfall.

Dorota Mosiewicz-Patalas said...

There are images of the Pope on your first page.

Where was he when millions of Italians spilled into the streets to prevent the same from happening?

He didn't want to get political? Suddenly the Church is forbidden to teach? Natural law and God's law have suddenly become matters of politics? As the head of the Church he couldn't have supported his flock and the cubs?

Bishop Henry has no support from him. We the parents have no support from him. If we persevere, the government will take our children from us. What an abomination this papacy is.