Homosexualist Daniel P Horan, OFM invited by Alberta Catholic Trustees Association

The Franciscan, Daniel P Horan, is a known dissenter. To learn more, read an excellent article by Sacerdotus here.

Further information about Horan is provided for us here and here by Vox Cantoris. 

A review of Horan's 2018 itinerary shows that besides lecturing all over the United States, he will also be traveling to the United Kingdom in April, and New Zealand in June. Quite the jet-setter. 

For Catholics in Canada, it is of grave concern that I inform you that Horan has been invited by the Alberta Catholic School Trustee's Association (ACSTA). 

You can contact the ACSTA requesting that they disinvite Horan as he does not follow the Magisterium of the Church.

ACSTA contact info:

Tel: (780) 484-6209

Email: admin@acsta.ab.ca

Twitter: @ACSTANews

Why the Church has to be tough on homosexuals: to get them to Heaven

Archbishop Blase Cupich and John Cardinal Dew are homosexualists. For all that, Dew's position has received a ringing endorsement from Fr. Thomas Rosica, CSB. But would St. Paul or St. John Chrysostom receive the same? This little essay will explain why not. Readers will understand that homosexual practices are grave violations of chastity [Catechism of the Catholic Church]. Just as a trainer works an athlete hard to be ready to run a good race; so the Church is "hard" on homosexuals, because She loves them and wants them to get to Heaven. The Church is "hard" on homosexuals and tells them the truth: each and every homosexual act is objectively gravely sinful. "Homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered". (Persona Humana, 8). Since the gravity of the sins cannot be diminished, to tamper with language in an age which is individualistic, rebellious and devoted to sexual revolution, will be seen by homosexuals as the Church down-watering her doctrine. Homosexuals seek to have language changed, because they, and their allies want to cause confusion, so that Catholics will not know what the Church teaches, and eventually not care. The gay-liberation movement (so-called) wants to do for sodomy, what the modernists did for the Pill.  

Words from a very evil "wolf" Cardinal John Dew

Let us now travel back in time. Let us have a quick glance at what the Church had to say in 1975, through Persona humana, and then, travel back further to read what the great Patriarch and Father of the Church, St. John Chrysostom had to say about the abominable evil of homosexuality. 

In the present period, the corruption of morals has increased, and one of the most serious indications of this corruption is the unbridled exaltation of sex. Moreover, through the means of social communication and through public entertainment this corruption has reached the point of invading the field of education and of infecting the general mentality...

...there are those who have put forward concepts and modes of behavior which are contrary to the true moral exigencies of the human person. Some members of the latter group have even gone so far as to favor a licentious hedonism.

As a result, in the course of a few years, teachings, moral criteria and modes of living hitherto faithfully preserved have been very much unsettled, even among Christians. 

So began the introduction to Persona humana, the document on sexual morality released by the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith in the mid 70s. Unfortunately, rather then settle the matter for those who claim to be Christian, this document, as well as the Catechism of the Catholic Church, have been unable to change minds and hearts. One could say that things since 1975 have got considerably worse. What else is one to conclude with priests and lay Catholics promoting (for example) the "homosexual agenda" (that is, whilst officially rejecting "gay marriage" are evasive on other aspects of the "gay subculture"?). If a Catholic claims to oppose "gay marriage", but is silent on the intrinsically evil nature of homosexual acts, what is one to conclude? If a Catholic claims that "gays" "love" each other, and that homosexual relationships cannot be compared to other evils, what are we think? 

If Catholics march in "gay Pride Parades", thereby giving public affirmation, what are we to deduce? Fr. Dariusz Oko, has termed the new proposals that obfuscate the evil of homosexuality as a "homoheresy" or "gender-ideology". The Polish Bishops Conference has dealt with this in a well reasoned Pastoral Letter dated the 2013 Feast of the Holy Family. The "homoheresy" is a gnostic ideology that claims that "gay is good", that homosexuality is simply another expression of love... In fact, homosexuals are usually deeply psychologically disturbed individuals - many have been sexually abused as children or young boys - many being raised in an all female environment, with absent fathers and strong male figures. Fundamentally, homosexual impulses (for whatever reason - be it psychological illness or demonic influence) are driven by phallic worship. Homosexuality is a sex cult. We can expect increases in homosexuality where the true God is no longer worshiped, where feminism is exalted, where child abuse and sexual license is  advocated. 

Persona humana distinguishes between those who have undertaken a homosexual lifestyle as a deliberate moral choice, and those who may be suffering from some sort of psychological pathology. Whatever the case,  "no pastoral method can be employed which would give moral justification to these acts on the grounds that they would be consonant with the condition of such people. For according to the objective moral order, homosexual relations are acts which lack an essential and indispensable finality. In Sacred Scripture they are condemned as a serious depravity and even presented as the sad consequence of rejecting God".

St. John Chrysostom, in his series of Homilies on Romans provides us with a detailed theological exposition on why homosexuality is one of the most evil of sins; why it is and forever remains one of the "four sins that cry to heaven for vengeance". Catholics need to see the world from God's perspective, not theirs. Some may, out of a sense of misguided compassion, wish to downplay Church teaching on the intrinsic evil of homosexual acts; some may wish to dismiss, out of hand, those who adhere to the Church as "fanatics"; others, even clergy, may pander in various ways with the "gay liberation" movement - in all of this a betrayal of Christ and His Church can be seen. We can no more pander to other sins, than to the sin of homosexuality. Certainly, culpability of some may be minimal due to a subjective psychological condition, but objectively each and every homosexual act is intrinsically evil.

The Church, via the Catechism of the Catholic Church states that temptations towards homosexuality constitute a trial; it is for these people that we are called upon to show compassion. "This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity" (n 2358). The Church does not ask us to respect sinful actions, nor to encourage those who engage in an aggressive public manifestation of homosexuality as a form of "liberation", or would seek to change civil legislation that would promote positive evil. Thus, the Church forbids not only "gay marriage", but also, "civil unions". 

The evil of homosexuality does not grow in a vacuum. The Patriarch of Constantinople demonstrates how it is that "ungodliness" and the rejection of truth that leads to men becoming "fools". And from this great conceit in a false wisdom, and refusal to follow the way of God, humanity would be given up to uncleaness and lusts of the heart.... ultimately these would exchange truth (e.g. marriage being between a man and a woman) for a lie (psuedo "gay marriage") and so on. In all of this, they reject the Creator and serve the creature. They become idolators. Homosexuality is, ultimately, a perverted sexual manifestation of self-idolatry, self-worship. It is, as the saint will say, "satanical", as it is at heart, blasphemy. 

In Book Four of his Homilies, the holy Patriarch provides us with a detailed exposition of the verse 1, 26, 27:

For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one towards another.

The saint continues: 

They changed the truth of God for a lie. And with regard to the men again, he shows the same thing by saying, Leaving the natural use of the woman. And in a like way with those, these he also puts out of all means of defending themselves by charging them not only that they had the means of gratification, and left that which they had, and went after another, but that having dishonored that which was natural, they ran after that which was contrary to nature. But that which is contrary to nature has in it an irksomeness and displeasingness, so that they could not fairly allege even pleasure. For genuine pleasure is that which is according to nature. But when God has left one, then all things are turned upside down. And thus not only was their doctrine Satanical, but their life too was diabolical.

And reflect too how significantly he uses his words. For he does not say that they were enamoured of, and lusted after one another, but, they burned in their lust one toward another...

...For there is not, there surely is not, a more grievous evil than this insolent dealing. For if when discoursing about fornication Paul said, that Every sin which a man does is without the body, but he that commits fornication sins against his own body (1 Corinthians 6:18); what shall we say of this madness, which is so much worse than fornication as cannot even be expressed? For I should not only say that you have become a woman, but that you have lost your manhood, and hast neither changed into that nature nor kept that which you had, but you have been a traitor to both of them at once, and deserving both of men and women to be driven out and stoned, as having wronged either sex. And that you may learn what the real force of this is, if any one were to come and assure you that he would make you a dog instead of being a man, would you not flee from him as a plague? But, lo! You have not made yourself a dog out of a man, but an animal more disgraceful than this.

...But nothing can there be more worthless than a man who has pandered himself. For not the soul only, but the body also of one who has been so treated, is disgraced, and deserves to be driven out everywhere. How many hells shall be enough for such? But if you scoff at hearing of hell and believest not that fire, remember Sodom. For we have seen, surely we have seen, even in this present life, a semblance of hell. For since many would utterly disbelieve the things to come after the resurrection, hearing now of an unquenchable fire, God brings them to a right mind by things present. For such is the burning of Sodom, and that conflagration! And they know it well that have been at the place, and have seen with their eyes that scourge divinely sent, and the effect of the lightnings from above. (Jude 7)

Consider how great is that sin, to have forced hell to appear even before its time! ...

And what is there more detestable than a man who has pandered himself, or what more execrable? Oh, what madness! Oh, what distraction! Whence came this lust lewdly revelling and making man's nature all that enemies could?

Franciscan "LGBT ministry" held event at infamous gay bar, "Stonewall"

St. Francis of Assisi Church, New York City (run by the Franciscans of Holy Name Province), operates a dissenting "LGBT ministry".  This "ministry" has, for a number of years, organized events at a number of gay bars, such as the Stonewall Inn. 

Such pro-"LGBT ministries" are extremely dangerous, misleading and not approved by the Church. Gay bars are hardly the place a person with same-sex attraction would go to if they were taking living a chaste life seriously. The absolute necessity for living chastely and avoiding grave sin is stressed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church: 

2357 ... homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered. They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.

2358. Homosexuals are called to chastity...

2396 Among the sins gravely contrary to chastity are masturbation, fornication, pornography, and homosexual practices.

Friends, the Franciscan involvement in the NYC gay scene is one to be exposed and condemned in the strongest possible terms. 

Please contact:

Cardinal Timothy Dolan

Phone: 212-371-1000

Monsignor Edward Weber
Phone: 212-371-1011 Ext. 2931
Email: Msgr.Edward.Weber@archny.org

Militant homosexuals take over the Archdiocese of New York City

The gay bar "RISE": the place of choice to hold "LGBT" social events by
the Paulists  and Holy Name Province (Franciscans) 

Joseph Sciambra carries a shocking report of an "LGBT" so-called "Catholic" event being organized by Out at St. Paul (a pro-homosexual group run out of St. Paul the Apostle church) at a notorious gay bar that features drag events. "Rise", one of the "top ten gay bars" in NYC, also was used by the Homo-Franciscans for their "Mardi Gras" social event in 2017. 

Sciambra writes: 

this is not the first time that OSP [Out at St. Paul] hosted an official gathering at a local gay bar. On March 22, 2017, OSP held their “Spring Social” at another notorious gay bar: “Bottoms Up.” Coincidently, a separate gay-affirmative Catholic LGBT outreach, also in the Archdiocese of New York, from St. Francis of Assisi Church, hosted their annual “Mardi Gras” party at Rise bar on February 28, 2017.

I have previously reported on the strange activities of the Homo-Franciscans, here, here, here, and here. One of them even opined openly in favour of homosexual activity:

The Church’s limited view of human sexuality, which is placed at the service of procreation and confined within the boundaries of sacramental marriage, therefore effectively prohibits LGBT persons from expressing the fullness of their humanity by excluding them from participating in healthy, generative relationships and mutual expressions of love...

...In order for the Catholic Church to truly rectify its complicity with the violence and injustices leveled against the LGBT community, a wholesale reevaluation of its stance on homosexuality, the dignity of individual persons, and “unjust discrimination” is required.

To understand how perverse and deviant homosexual behaviour is, the following link provides peer-reviewed, scientific information on the practice of "fisting" [warning: very graphic] and the practice of "rectal insertion". 


Dear friends, please keep all homosexuals in your prayers that they be released from this demonic possession. They lead sad, tragic lives, many of them corrupted to same-sex attraction due to sexual abuse as infants and children, many have had abusive or non-existent fathers, many were abused as young boys and teenagers. 

WHERE WAS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH WHEN JUSTIN TRUDEAU WAS PROMOTING ABORTION, LGBT AGENDA FOR YEARS?

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did not come out as a militant supporter of the "LGBT" agenda last week. He did not come out as a rabid abortion advocate yesterday. Justin Trudeau did not come out as a strident euthanasia supporter this morning. He did not come out as promoter of transvestites a minute ago. 

No! Justin Trudeau, has for YEARS - more than OPENLY - advocated for all these positions. More scandalously, the Bishops of Canada (with a few exceptions to the rule, such as Cardinal Collins' Open Letter) have been, and remain silent.

The Bishops even not so subtly campaigned for the pro-abortion, pro-LGBT agenda, pro-euthanasia Trudeau. When these bishops released their "election guide" they could not even bring themselves to mention the word "ABORTION". Canadians ended up becoming disenfranchised through the lack of resistance from these ineffectual, cowardly men. 

Suddenly, after all these years, Justin Trudeau has become "arrogant" in the eyes of Fr. Thomas Rosica, CSB. Really? Is that all he is? 

Abortion, euthanasia, LGBT promotion, - this is not just arrogance - this is SIN. This is EVIL. Trudeau is EVIL. He has the blood of babies on his hands! He promotes men having anal "sex" (SODOMY) with teenage boys. No, Justin Trudeau is a disgusting, vile creature. Trudeau is arrogant because he is evil.  

The Vox at the blog, Vox Cantoris accurately described Trudeau in this manner back in March of 2016: 

Justin Trudeau is a pathetic man. He is an egoist and an arrogant despicable cretin who has betrayed his baptism on some false notion of "Quebec values!" He is an incompetent. A snow-board instructor. A plebeian. A man unfit to govern a nation. A second rate school teacher and dramatist.

Things got so bad that I once asked: "is Salt and Light a propaganda arm for Justin Trudeau"? Last May, 2017, I wrote: 

I encourage readers to watch the entirety of the following video: it will show you the truly dark, demonic, fascistic, pro-abortion bent of Trudeau. Behind the buffoonery, the narcissistic selfies, the effeminate voice, there lurks the heart and soul of a totalitarian. 

Even the left-wing Toronto Star was able to call out Trudeau in 2014. But not our illustrious churchmen. Why? Are their minds even more warped and full of mush than leftist journalists? 

The Vox carries a detailed report on the latest decision by the Liberal Government regarding summer jobs programs. The Vox documents the years of open and known evil (especially the promotion of perverse and deviant "sex", bordering on the promotion of pedophilia) of Justin Trudeau's Liberal regime. Personally, cutting off some money for religious organizations is neither here nor there. Catholics should be going to the faithful for money, not to the taxpayers. The problem is the reason why Trudeau wants to cut them off:  they must take a pledge of loyalty to Trudeau's position on abortion.

Now, after all these years of silence, this decision by Trudeau not to give taxpayer money to organizations who do not sign off in favour of abortion, results in him being excoriated. Where were these people for the last five years and more as Trudeau promoted abortion, advocated lowering the age of consent for anal "sex" to 16? Marched incessantly in "Gay Pride parades" that promote homosexual behaviour? Why this sudden outrage? Why no strong opposition to abortion all these years? Is it money? Follow the money, dear friends. They love money, more than they love truth and Our Lord Jesus Christ.

I have a few questions for these churchmen: 

Where were they five years ago, when Justin Trudeau was a noisy, repugnant, anti-Christian member of Parliament? 

Where were they when he considered severing Canada as a nation, to protect abortion? 

Where were they when he came out as Liberal Party Leader and banned pro-life candidates? 

Where were they when he was running on an openly, militantly, pro-abortion and pro-LGBT agenda platform? 

Where were they when he was pushing euthanasia? 

Where were they when he rammed euthanasia through Parliament? 

Where were they when he spent most of last summer attending "Gay Pride Parades"? 

Where were they when he promised the homosexuals that he would lower the age of consent for anal "sex" to sixteen? 

Where were they when he announced a $650, 000, 000 abortion funding program? 

Where were they when Trudeau's hand-chosen atheist Governor General mocked religion? 

Where were they when he came out over the past week - time and again - in his town hall meetings in favour of  abortion and the LGBT agenda?

I will tell you where they were: they were SILENT. They were collaborators, they were encouragers, they were supporters, cheer-leaders, admirers!!!

Now, suddenly, they begin to complain about Trudeau when he begins to hit their money ticket. Well, dear bishops and priests of Canada: do you know why Trudeau and the Liberals are becoming more and more aggressive in their fascism? Because YOU did nothing, but sat back and enable him. Look in the mirror Your Excellencies and Reverend Fathers. Now you will begin to see why Trudeau is "arrogant". We Catholics are not interested in what you are saying about Justin Trudeau; we are interested in what you will DO about Justin Trudeau.

Last night I tweeted to the French language version of Salt and Light TV the following two tweets:

This morning, I discovered that I was blocked on Twitter by S + L. Apparently asking questions is a no-no for the organization that claims it is "a unique instrument of the New Evangelization". This is how they answer serious questions. You will notice the questions contained nothing personal, no ad hominem attacks. Dear readers, judge for yourselves.

For all of Fr. Rosica's very, very recent statements critical of Justin Trudeau, as of this morning, the Vatican "adviser" has yet to take down the following scandalous tweet: 

Another tweet, - very bizarre and strange - released a few hours ago by Fr. Rosica raises very serious questions. The most obvious question is: was Fr. Rosica one of those admirers? You, dear readers, decide. 

What kind of Christian would have "respect" for pro-abortion, pro-euthanasia, pro-LGBT agenda Trudeau?

What kind of Christian would have "admiration" for Trudeau and his years long promotion of intrinsic evil? 

No, Fr. Rosica it IS a Liberal decision (the Liberals chose Trudeau as their leader, and they chose to go down the path that he and his advisers want). Stop trying to defend the Liberal Party (which is OFFICIALLY pro-abortion). 

Trudeau was NEVER "open, inclusive and intelligent". He was always a vicious fascist. Trudeau would only "baffle" the mind of a fool or someone in denial.

Justin Trudeau is not "model"[ing], he is revealing just a bit more who he really is. The Catholic Church in Canada still cannot seem to detach itself from its sycophantic relationship with the deceptive, evil, pro-death Liberal Party of Canada. 

To close, I once again ask Fr. Rosica to remove the disgraceful tweets showing Justin Trudeau at "prayer" in the Sistine Chapel. 

FR. ROSICA TAKE DOWN THAT TWEET!

Daniel P. Horan OFM unloads expletive-riddled tirade on Twitter: Calls pro-life marchers: "Pseudo-prophets..."

Daniel P. Horan OFM., of the dissenting Holy Name Province has opined on the vast throng who have turned up in Washington. D.C for the "March for Life". 

Horan tweeted out a tirade of hate-filled statements, one even including an expletive in a self-styled "prayer". Horan goes on to accuse those who defend the unborn as indulging in "selective ________". 

This explosion of emotional anger is the true Horan: hate-filled, narcissistic, spiteful, elitist, privileged - a typical liberal white man. These are not holy words and thoughts one would expect from a follower of St. Francis. 

In a short article, Horan wrote in 2014, entitled, "The Intimate Journey of Relationship with God", he wrote of St. Francis thus: 

He would embrace those people thought to be unembraceable and love those that no one else dared to love: the poor, the sick, the forgotten, the outcast.

I guess those were just nice words as Horan prepared for his PhD. Horan has no love for pro-life marchers: no embrace, no love: only hate. 

What about the children who were rescued from abortion, who walk in the "March for Life". What about the women who have had abortions and suffer because of their "choice", who walk in the "March for Life". What about parents who have lost daughters, who died from supposed, "safe, legal" abortions, who walk in the "March for Life". What abut the couples who cannot adopt, because there are no children to adopt...?

And what about Mary Wagner, who CANNOT walk in the "March for Life" because she is in prison for her pro-life beliefs in Canada?

Dan Horan: who are you to judge Mary Wagner, and all millions of people who oppose abortion?

Dan Horan: some "intimate journey", some "relationship with God". 

A History of the Homosexual Takeover of the Dominican Order

How many know that the Dominican Order was infiltrated by homosexuals in the 1950s, well before the Second Vatican Council? How many are aware that by the late 1960s, these homosexuals had taken over entire seminaries.

It is Toronto Catholic Witness' honour to present to our readers the following lecture on the history of the homosexual takeover of the Dominicans by the great, prophetic Fr. John O'Connor. 

Fr. O'Connor was that voice in the wilderness, who, decades ago warned us about homosexual infiltration in the Church [warning: graphic content. Not suitable for children].

As Fr. O' Connor points out in the video, Donald J Goergen O.P., expelled for homosexual activity from St. Bernard's Seminary in 1969, was quickly taken into a Dominican seminary and appointed professor, though he was not even ordained. Such was the power of the homosexuals who already controlled the Dominican seminary. 

Goergen eventually went on to be elected superior of the Mid-West Province in the mid 80s, despite opposition from Fr. O'Connor and another Dominican. The two priests warned the Dominicans they cannot elect a man who had been expelled for homosexual activity, and who had spent years promoting homosexuality and heresy. To no avail. Goergen was elected, reflecting massive support for homosexuality. 

Not taking Goergen's election lying down, Fr. John O'Connor continued the fight against him and other militant homosexuals in the Order. Goergen's response was to suspend Fr. O'Connor and eventually expel him. 

Fr. O' Connor's appeal to Rome failed, because too many homosexuals in the Vatican Curia were backing up Goergen. Fr. O' Connor once said that he was honoured to be expelled, as the Order he had joined no longer existed.

Fr. O' Connor also brought to light, in his many talks, Goergen's vicious, heretical book, "The Sexual Celibate" (that also denied the Blessed Mother's virginity), which promoted "healthy homosexuality". A book, wherein, Georgen stated that he was "a man with a feminine dimension". 

Goergen wrote in support of homosexual activity: 

“Environment can give strength to the homosexual dimension of the personality by bringing together members of the same sex … to the exclusion of the other sex. There is no reason to fool ourselves about this. Celibate people are sexual beings like everyone else. When affectionate and genital feelings enter homosexual friendship, one should recognize and accept their presence. This does not mean the relationship is unhealthy.”

Friends, understand what Homo-Dominican Goergen is saying here: not only is sodomy good, but that an all male environment can "give strength to the homosexual dimension..." We now see why these homosexuals congregate especially in religious Orders, such as the Dominicans and the Franciscans. Precisely because these larger all male environments encourage, embolden, and protect homosexuals and homosexual activity. 

The Vatican infiltrated by Freemasonry?

Archbishop Stanisław Gądecki stated on his blog, just over two years ago, regarding the meetings at the Synod of the Family, that the spirit of freemasonry was afoot amongst many of the bishops with regards to dialogue, and their secular view of the world: 

 "the dialogue on human rights is from the point of view of the illuminati of the 19th century." 

Dear friends, I ask you to reconsider these words by the Archbishop taking into consideration the release of the materially heretical "Amoris Latitia", the various scandalous statements coming from Rome, the ongoing homosexual crisis in the clergy (are Freemasons using homosexual clergy to advance the destruction of the Church?), the strange statements by churchmen to politicians and at the UN, etc. 

I ask you to seriously consider the role and influence of Freemasonry, considering the recent announcements of the Secretary of State, Cardinal Parolin about the "church of the new paradigm".  Just what is this "church" the eminent Cardinal speaks of? A protestant "church"? masonic "church"?

Whether Cardinal Parolin wears the apron, we do not know. What we do know is he speaks and acts like a Freemason. We know, as the day to day manager of the Church, he sits back and does nothing as the destroyers run free. 

International Freemasonry has sought to infiltrate the Catholic Church for decades. Can we forget the Alta Vendita, or the marches of Freemasons in Rome during 1917, where a young Fr. Maximilian Kolbe reported that the Freemasons boasted of infiltrating the Vatican and turning the Pope into their "errand boy"? Can Catholics forget the power of the P2 Lodge, that contained the names of high ranking churchmen? 

"The enemy forces, inspired by the evil spirit, ever wage war on the Christian name...the Masonic sect, which, strong in manpower and resources, is the leader in a war against anything sacred". Pope Leo XIII (Inimica Vis)

Let us not be deluded: Our Lord Jesus Christ has real enemies. These Masons have infiltrated the Church. The devil uses every trick in the book to lie and deceive us: Judaism and its offspring, Islam, political Zionism, Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Capitalism, Globalism, Protestantism, Ecumenism, Environmentalism, Religious Liberty, the Occult, the Sexual Revolution - and so on. The devil never runs out of lies to deceive. 

     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[original blog post published, late 2015] 

I can now report that during the Morning  Session discussions of Group A (Italicus) on October 8th, 2015, the influence of Freemasonry was raised. The  incident was recorded by Archbishop Stanisław Gądecki on his blog. The fact that Synod Fathers are raising the issue of Freemasonry helps explain the blasphemies, the heresies, the cloud of dark confusion and evil that surrounds the machinations of a group of churchmen intent on overturning the unchangeable teaching of Our Lord Jesus Christ on Holy Matrimony and human sexuality. 

Specifically, Archbishop Gądecki noted that there were Synod Fathers in Italicus A who were concerned that  the spirit of masonic influence had infected sections of  the Instrumentum Laboris. 

It is very reasonable to consider that the spirit of Antichrist dwells in the hearts and souls of some of the men who stroll the marble halls of Vatican City. False shepherds, wolves in sheep's clothing, seeking to lead the Flock astray. Vade retro me Satana!  

From the Archbishop's blog: 

Toronto Catholic Witness translation: 

"Dialogue on human rights is the point of view of the illuminati of the 19th century; where is the theology? Where are the Rights of God?  Instead of the work of creation, we have talk about ecology".

Members of Italicus A:

Moderator: Card. Montenegro Francesco

Relator: Rev.do P. Arroba Conde, C.M.F. Manuel Jesús
(Members: Bassetti, Caffarra, Celli, Coccopalmerio, Fisichella, Gadecki, Pinto, Rylko, Sandri, Shevchuk, Spadaro, Sturla Berhouet, Urosa Savino…)

James Franco: accusations of sexual assault reveals Hollywood connection to Aleister Crowley and Satanism

James Franco between Luciferians, Kenneth Anger and Brian Butler

James Franco may finally be facing justice. A number of women are accusing him of sexual abuse within the context of filming a sex orgy. Apparently simulated sexual activity was not enough for Franco. Supposedly appearing out of nowhere, Franco (highly popular with silly teenage girls) was propelled to stardom overnight. However, "stardom" just does not happen, but is pre-arranged. As a film student, Franco made his first film about occultist and Satanist, Kenneth Anger. Anger is primarily, but not exclusively, responsible for bringing to the United States the dark occult and satanic teachings of Aleister Crowley. Little do teenage girls realize that their matinee idol is an occultist and devote of Anger. 

How many people are aware of the profound influence Anger has over film-making? How many people are aware of Anger's extensive use of the teachings of Crowley? Through Anger, Crowley's sybaritic, gnostic, occult and satanic religion of Thelema, has permeated Hollywood. From Hollywood, it has been spread around the world. How many are aware, for example,  that famed director, Martin Scorsese (praised by Homo-Jesuits and others) is an admirer of Kenneth Anger? 

Brilliantly, in the 1960s, Anger began to associate himself with foolish, impressionable, but highly popular young men within rock music. Anger travelled and associated with the Rolling Stones, encouraged Jimmy Page in his devotion to Crowley. Anger was well aware that through popular stars - be it in music or cinema - he would be able to initiate millions, tens of millions into Thelema ideology, subliminally. Anger's film work would eventually permeate the video work of sexual deviant David Bowie, etc. Bowie, a devotee of the occult and Crowley, would be lionized in death by none other than Gianofranco Cardinal Ravasi. Witnessed published a rebuttal of the Cardinal here and here. 

Hollywood's two leading Thelemites: Anger and Butler

Crowley, who died in 1947, was ahead of his time. The world was not quite ready to receive the full force of his teachings. It took Kenneth Anger, to spread Thelema, far and wide. Anger's two films, "Lucifer Rising", and "Invocation of my Demon brother" reflect the film-maker's awareness of societal and cultural readiness to accept Crowleyism.

Now we have Franco exposed as just another Hollywood pervert. The devil loves to double-cross his stooges. Little did Franco think that his sexual escapades would be outed. With the Hollywood publicity machine presenting Franco as a clean cut matinee idol, the reality was always different. His video, featuring Anger, and overseen by Anger's protege, Brian Butler, revealed Franco as another Hollywood Thelemite reeking in occultism and deviancy. 

Most do not know the centrality of sex to the ideology of Crowley. Most do not know how influential his teachings are upon the promotion of unnatural sex: especially homosexuality. Crowley himself was a voracious bi-sexual predator who lived as he taught. For Crowley, sexual joining and acts are symbolic of a pantheistic re-creating of the universe. Sexmagick is the conduit to immortality. 

Logically, Crowley promoted such perversion as: sodomy, urolagnia, coprophagia, algolagnia, spermophagia as part of his sexual "magick". All these perversions are now promoted as normal alternative "lifestyles" by the "LGBT" liberation agenda. It was only normal that Anger glorify "homoeroticism" in his films. It is only normal that Thelemite occultist, James Franco be finally outed as another abuser of women. After all, was not Crowley himself not a notorious misogynist?

To return to the present, should we be surprised that Hollywood, is rife with occultism? Rife with sodomy? Rife with mockery of religion and family? 

When the vast majority of people think of Hollywood, most do not think of Aleister Crowley, Kenneth Anger, or Brian Butler. Most do not think of Hollywood as the propaganda arm for Thelema. It is time they did. It is time you did.