Since faith is one, it must be professed in all its purity and integrity". Pope Francis/Pope Benedict
email:torontocatholicwitness@rogers.com

Saturday, 7 January 2017

"Liberal Democratic Order": CIA, FBI and NSA admit they work for international Freemasonry

The CIA, FBI and NSA have now gone on record as being the advocates of international Freemasonry. In their Report, which they had the audacity to release on Christmas Day in the East, and Epiphany in the West, they attempted to implicate President Vladimir Putin (who, by the way was in church yesterday) in leaking the vile emails of the DNC to the world. They further reported on page 11 that "the Kremlin sought to advance its longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order...". "Russian media hailed President-elect Trump's victory as...the latest example of Western liberalism's collapse".  (p.14)



Now, liberalism is anti-Catholic and contrary to the Gospels. Pope Leo XIII wrote in Libertas: 

What naturalists or rationalists aim at in philosophy, that the supporters of liberalism, carrying out the principles laid down by naturalism, are attempting in the domain of morality and politics.The fundamental doctrine of rationalism is the supremacy of the human reason, which, refusing due submission to the divine and eternal reason, proclaims its own independence, and constitutes itself the supreme principle and source and judge of truth.

There has been and continues to be a huge uproar in the masonic media about Russian interference that swung the election to Donald Trump. The uproar is that Trump does not seem to be on board with the designs of international Freemasonry. As a populist and patriot, he stands as an opponent of globalism and the "liberal democratic order" (to quote the Report). 

However, the fact is, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. The fact may well have been, that the leaked emails may have motivated innumerable abortionists, homosexuals, occultists and to vote for Clinton. The CIA is well aware that the leaked emails actually did NOT influence the election. This is the sad reality. Even after the release of these emails, Clinton still managed to win the popular vote. The real deciding factor was that three small States who are heavily populated with farmers and with common sense, held the fort and gave Trump the victory. 





The present US Government, under the mis-leadership of the thuggish Barack Obama, gave Orthodox Russia a Christmas "present" full of half-truths, propaganda, lies, smear and innuendo. 

If people like Barack Obama hate Vladimir Putin, it should tell us something. Likewise, when people like Nancy Pelosi comment thus: "Vladimir Putin's assault on American democracy was political thuggery in support of Donald Trump". Such a remark should give us pause to reflect on what really is going on.  

If the vast majority (there were a few standout bishops who did not go along with the pro-DNC mafia running the USCCB) of Churchmen had got their way the militantly pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, family-hating, criminal and occultist Hillary Clinton who be occupying the Oval Office. Thank God there were still enough common sense peasants and farmers who held their ground and voted for Trump. Even after Clinton came out strongly in the final debate in favour of killing babies as they are being born, the US bishops (with rare exceptions) remained silent.




Contrast their sinful nonsense to the reflections of Bishop Richard Williamson on the US elections. 

Trump’s Election

For Trump we must pray. Since last month’s election
He will be needing Heaven’s own protection.


The essential thing to say about the election last month of Donald Trump as the next President of the United States is that it is a God-given reprieve from years and years of liberal government, but unless the American people themselves turn back seriously to Almighty God, then the reprieve will be swept away by a return of the liberals in force to destroy the United States once and for all, as Hilary Clinton would have done, had she been elected.

Now it is true that not many people today think of politics in terms of Almighty God, but that is exactly the problem. To shut him out of life, especially out of politics, has been a crusade for Freemasons and liberals ever since the end of their 18th century. Liberty from God has been the crusade of their substitute religion, secular humanism. Similarly in the 20th century Communism with or without the name has triumphed against nature all over the world because it acts like a religion, being, as Pius XI calls it, the messianism of materialism. And liberalism and Communism are why the entire Western world has been tilting to the left for hundreds of years.

And that is no doubt why a large number of voters in that American election voted for the candidate who lost. She was known all over the nation for her lying, immorality and treason. Her criminal record was notorious, including the suspicion of her having been responsible with her husband for the murder of well over fifty men and women who had got in the way of their ambition and careers. How could anybody halfway decent have even thought of voting for her, let alone more than half of all Americans who voted (she did not win the Electoral College)? Paul Craig Roberts himself, excellent commentator on the American political scene, is baffled by that question. The missing answer is surely that that woman incarnated the war against God. For liberals, liberty is their religion. That she proudly broke all of God’s commandments was an argument not against her, but for her. She is a Saint of liberalism.

Now her conqueror, Donald Trump, is not, to all appearances, a specially godly man, and he is still liberal in various ways – who is not? – but he has within him a good dose of that old-fashioned decency and generosity which used to be typical of the best in America and Americans. Therefore he is instinctively against ungodly people, and after years and years of self-righteous liberals under a series of liberal Presidents trampling all over decent Americans, he had had enough, and he stepped into politics “to give back to this country some of what it has given to me.” And after the same years and years of what had in fact been a one-party System, because there had not been since Governor Wallace’s time “a dime’s worth of difference between the Republicans and the Democrats,” Trump bucked the System, gave voice to the people’s frustration, and a host of decent souls voted him into office. But the System is furious.

Therefore he must now think hard. He has become President-elect on the strength of decent instincts against liberal ideology. But that is a flash in the pan, because to fight against ideology with instincts is like fighting tanks with a pea-shooter. To fight a false ideology one needs a true ideology, and to fight against war on God one needs peace with God, which will be on God’s terms and not on man’s. Now God is all-powerful and infinitely good, and he can undo the worst that his enemies can attempt to do against him with the merest flick of his little finger, so to speak. But he is not going to grant victory over the Synagogue of Satan if he knows that the people that he is saving are going to go straight back to Satan. The people must come away from Satan and turn back sincerely to God, who is not deceived.

At the very least Donald Trump himself must pray – ACTS – with Adoration, Contrition, Thanksgiving and Supplication. God has been with him, to grant this reprieve. Let us all include him and President Putin in our own prayers, to prolong the reprieve. Otherwise it could soon be over.

Kyrie eleison.

3 comments:

Lawrence and Susan Fox said...

I'm an ex-Never Trumper, who voted for Donald Trump. And I'm glad I did. I'm living in Austria now, and I had to send my ballot twice two different ways because it kept not arriving, but those great people in Colorado kept encouraging me to keep trying. Voting from overseas is no easy task. But American's died for my right to vote, and I would not spurn their sacrifice.

Trump is doing a great job of putting pro-life people in key positions in housing and education. If he cuts corporate taxes our economy will boom and the poor -- left jobless by Obama -- will be able to work! I didn't realise it but he is exactly what we needed, someone strong who wouldn't put up with liberal nonsense. I unfortunately believed a lot of propaganda about him before the election that he was wishy washy pro-life, but now I know that is not the case at all. I remember complaining to God about our candidate. I didn't think he was conservative enough. God told me, "Susan, pray for Donald Trump because he is the hope for America." It wasn't like God was saying Trump was a saint. No, God thought Trump was someone He could work with! What a joy. No one in our government has been working with God for 8 years!

Thanks for your post Barona, and thanks for standing up for life in America. God bless you. Susan Fox www.christsfaithfulwitness.com

Mark Thomas said...

"If the vast majority (there were a few standout bishops who did not go along with the pro-DNC mafia running the USCCB) of Churchmen had got their way the militantly pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, family-hating, criminal and occultist Hillary Clinton who be occupying the Oval Office. Even after Clinton came out strongly in the final debate in favour of killing babies as they are being born, the US bishops (with rare exceptions) remained silent."

Barona, I respect greatly your unwavering defense and promotion of the Culture of Life. You perform God's work in that regard. Via your important blog, you exercise international influence in the promotion of the Culture of Life.

Barona, thank you for that.

In regard to the Bishops of the United States and their teachings related to pro-life issues that surfaced during the 2016 A.D. United States presidential campaign, I offer the following:

Barona, perhaps we should consider that the Bishops of the United States informed the Faithful as to the tremendous importance that Catholic voters were required to devote to the issue of abortion.

In that regard, I offer the following from LifeSiteNews:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/catholic-discernment-in-the-u.s.-presidential-election-of-2016

Catholic discernment in the U.S. presidential election of 2016

Barona, Father Peter M.J. Stravinskas praised the United States Catholic bishops for the their insistence that Catholic voters are called by Holy Mother Church to "vote according to an informed Christian conscience."

Father Stravinskas praised the bishops' document "Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship: A Call to Political Responsibility from the Catholic Bishops of the United States."

Father Stravinskas declared via their document in question, "the bishops of our nation provide sound instruction."

Father Stravinskas said: "Certain issues must always be entered into the moral calculus of one’s vote. The bishops are crystal clear about priorities."

The bishops said that a "prime example is the intentional taking of innocent human life, as in abortion and euthanasia. In our nation, “abortion and euthanasia have become preeminent threats to human dignity because they directly attack life itself, the most fundamental human good and the condition for all others” (Living the Gospel of Life, n. 5).

"It is a mistake with grave moral consequences to treat the destruction of innocent human life merely as a matter of individual choice. A legal system that violates the basic right to life on the grounds of choice is fundamentally flawed."

Finally, Father Stravinskas noted that the United States "bishops leave no doubt about Catholic social teaching on abortion and euthanasia: “The direct and intentional destruction of innocent human life from the moment of conception until natural death is always wrong and is not just one issue among many. It must always be opposed.”

Barona, as Father Stravinskas made clear, the United States bishops provided U.S. Catholic voters with an abundance of information in regard to the issue of abortion.

Thanks to the bishops of the United States, the information was there for U.S. Catholic voters to have formed their consciences in line with Church teaching.

Pax.

Mark Thomas

Mark Thomas said...

Bishop Williamson said..."Now her conqueror, Donald Trump, is not, to all appearances, a specially godly man, and he is still liberal in various ways – who is not? – but he has within him a good dose of that old-fashioned decency and generosity which used to be typical of the best in America and Americans. Therefore he is instinctively against ungodly people..."

Bishop Williamson's above comments are inconsistent.

1. He said that Donald Trump is not a specially godly man.

2. However, Donald Trump, although not a godly man, according to Bishop Williamson, possess a good dose of decency.

3. Donald Trump, although not a godly man, according to Bishop Williamson, "is instinctively against ungodly people..."

Again, Bishop Williamson's comments in question are inconsistent. He said that Donald Trump is not a specially godly man but has an instinct against ungodliness.

An ungodly man is a decent man who, although he is ungodly? An ungodly man is against ungodly people?

Bishop Williamson's comments in question don't make sense.

That said, my purpose isn't to pass judgment upon Mister Donald Trump's soul. As sinful as I am (I'm ashamed of my sins), I couldn't possibly even think to judge Donald Trump's (or anybody) soul. I find simply that Bishop Williamson's comments in question untenable.

I don't believe that it's sensible to label a man "ungodly," then portray said person as a moral man who stands against ungodliness.

Pax.

Mark Thomas