Since faith is one, it must be professed in all its purity and integrity". Pope Francis/Pope Benedict

Wednesday, 20 September 2017

CATHOLIC EDUCATION? St. Michael's College is a scandal for the Church in Toronto

From the 2011 Frosh week at St. Michael's College, the University of Toronto. Readers can decide for themselves if these images reflect Catholic education. Catholics understand why His Eminence, Thomas Cardinal Collins wishes to place the school directly under his control, removing it from the neo-modernist cabal that is controlling the Faculty. 

His Eminence is well aware of the evils that pervade St. Michael's. Please pray that the Cardinal succeeds to wrest control from the Basilians, who (unfortunately) are being backed up by the Roman authorities. The Vatican meddling in a Toronto local issue is indeed disgraceful, and un-Catholic. It is  an ironic perversity that at the very time the Pope is seeking to diffuse the Liturgy into a state of complete chaos, by placing it in the hands of national churches (a very protestant concept); he is at the same time backing the neo-modernists who are blocking Cardinal Collins' right as Bishop of Toronto (a very Catholic concept) to control education. 

Pope Benedict XVI, addressing Catholics in England in 2010 spoke of Catholic education in this manner:
As you know, the task of a teacher is not simply to impart information or to provide training in skills intended to deliver some economic benefit to society; education is not and must never be considered as purely utilitarian. It is about forming the human person, equipping him or her to live life to the full – in short it is about imparting wisdom. And true wisdom is inseparable from knowledge of the Creator, for “both we and our words are in his hand, as are all understanding and skill in crafts” (Wis 7:16).

A good school provides a rounded education for the whole person. And a good Catholic school, over and above this, should help all its students to become saints.

Do these images reflect "forming the human person" helping "all its students to become saints"?  

Monday, 18 September 2017

BREAKING: Bishop Robert McElroy comes out defending homosexualist propaganda in the Church

Robert McElroy, homosexualist bishop of San Diego 

Bishop Robert McElroy, the Bishop of San Diego has ventured to speak out in favour of Fr. James Martin S.J., pro-"LGBT" book, "Crossing a Bridge". McElroy officially endorsed Martin's book when first published. For a history of the on-going dissent in San Diego, please visit Joseph Sciambra's website for details. 

I shall only highlight a few remarks by McElroy for readers to see that this bishop is a hard-core homosexualist. Readers shoud immediately note that McElroy uses homosexual propaganda by using "LGBT". 

McElroy states: 
He [James Martin S.J.] entered it knowing that the theological issues pertaining to homosexuality constituted perhaps the most volatile element of ecclesial life in U.S. culture.
Do they Bishop McElroy? Are you really telling readers that homosexuality constitutes "the most volatile element of ecclesial life.." If you are correct then you must be also telling us that "most" priest and bishops are themselves homosexuals. Why else would homosexuality be such a big issue, since we know that actual homosexuals in the general population are between 1-3 %? 

Let us move on. McElroy then states: 
The attacks on Building a Bridge tap into long-standing bigotry within the church and U.S. culture against members of the L.G.B.T. community. The persons launching these attacks portray the reconciliation of the church and the L.G.B.T. community not as a worthy goal but as a grave cultural, religious and familial threat. Gay sexual activity is seen not as one sin among others but as uniquely debased to the point that L.G.B.T. persons are to be effectively excluded from the family of the church. Pejorative language and labels are deployed regularly and strategically. The complex issues of sexual orientation and its discernment in the life of the individual are dismissed and ridiculed.

The above needs a little unpacking, as McElroy is mixing falsehood and truth (a typical modernist tactic). Are there individuals who use hateful words towards those suffering from same sex attraction? Yes, there are. However, such individuals are not part of this debate. Further, McElroy is wrong in claiming that there are those who claims homosexuals are to be excluded from the Church. I have consistently argued on this blog that a main reason homosexuality is growing is because unnatural sexual vice is also practiced in epidemic proportions amongst men and women. Even amongst married couples. These couples are gross sinners, but they - just like homosexuals - are not, by their sin, automatically excommunicated from the Church. 

Consider why unnatural sex has spread far and wide, even amongst Catholics. Was it not too long ago that Christopher West, the self-proclaimed expert in the "theology of the body" tried to excuse oral and anal sex? When he was called out he tried to obfuscate, by claiming it was not his cup of tea. However, he never denounced such acts as evil. To my knowledge, he has yet to denounce such abominations. Yet, he is endorsed by "conservative" Archbishop Chaput! But then, this is also the same Archbishop who panders to the false religion of Judaism. 

To return to unnatural vice, such as oral "sex". My understanding is that the vast majority of protestants practice these unnatural vices, once the reserve of prostitutes for wayward husbands. Indeed, even EWTN in one of its Q and A sections on its website promoted oral "sex". What are we to expect from poor people with same-sex attraction when they see married couples profaning the nuptial bed? Such deformation of marriage also led to an explosion in child abuse. We know how child abuse leads straight to homosexuality. Sadly, though, bishops like Robert McElroy are silent on oral and anal "sex" between men and women, silent on contraception, silent on sexual immorality that profanes the marriage act.  

Let us now move onto McElroy's attempt to square the circle. The real question is can there be - as McElroy claims - a "reconciliation of the church [sic] and the LGBT community...." What does Bishop McElroy mean? Is there to be reconciliation between Christ and Belial? Bishop McElroy gives the game away when he speaks of "the complex issues of sexual orientation..." Can we imagine a bishop speaking of "the complex issues of adultery", or "the complex issues of theft" etc.? Here, we see McElroy showing complete disingenuousness and promoting homosexual propaganda. You will also notice that McElroy when he speaks of homosexual activity as a "sin" he addresses it from the perspective of  those who oppose Fr. Martin. Not once, in the entire article does McElroy come out and say it: homosexuality is always and everywhere objectively a grave mortal sin.  

McElroy then goes on to say: 
Chastity is a very important virtue of the Christian moral life. The disciple is obligated to confine genital sexual activity to marriage.
But chastity is not the central virtue in the Christian moral life. Our central call is to love the Lord our God with all our heart and to love our neighbor as ourselves. Many times, our discussions in the life of the church suggest that chastity has a singularly powerful role in determining our moral character or our relationship with God. It does not.
Bishop McElroy you are WRONG! We cannot love God without leading chaste lives. Practicing homosexuals (or for that matter husband and wife who practice oral "sex") are not living chaste lives. 

Chastity is integral, it is absolutely necessary, just as avoidance of murder, rape, or any other grave sin. Chastity therefore has a very deciding role in determining our moral character in our relationship to God. Those guilty of sexual sin will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Do you Bishop McElroy forget the words of St. Paul? Sacred Scripture is very clear: those engaging in illicit sexual activity will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Further, homosexuality is identified in Sacred Scripture as one of the Four Sins that cry to Heaven for Vengeance. One does not get to Heaven on keeping nine out of ten Commandments. 

Let us now review what homosexuals actually do to each other and consider if such behaviour destroys a relationship with God. 

ABORTION? Forget abortion!: dissident priests obsess with LGBT agenda, DACA, "white supremacy" and Bernie Sanders

A wealthy and powerful Jesuit telling young Americans that illegals
have a "right" to STEAL their place in Medical School!

I am not an American, but I am a Catholic and this is ultimately a moral issue. In reviewing the following I could not help placing myself in the position of a young American who just by a few marks lost a place at Medical School - to someone who has no right to be there.  What is a right? It is something that is owed me, by what I am.

I find it utterly disgraceful that young Americans have had the opportunity to attend Medical School STOLEN from them.

Militant homosexualist and non-American, Br. Christian Seno interfering
in an internal American political decision on dealing with illegals  

The Homo-Jesuits, the Homo-Franciscans may think this is a joke. A number of them also obsess with "identity politics"; finding "white supremacy" under every bush etc. Many of them are also not even Americans (such as "Br" Ramoncito Razon and "Br" Christian Seno - both Franciscans), but they are quick off the mark telling Americans how to live their lives. 

Vulgar "white supremacy" obsessed  homosexualist Br Ramoncito Razon 
- who is not American - telling Americans how to run their country

Notice how Razon excuses Antifa violence? 

 However, what can we expect from "men" (???) who excuse and even promote unnatural sexual activity as somehow equivalent to the holy and chaste acts proper between a husband and wife? Acts that reflect the Union betwixt Christ and His Church.

 Dear friends, a cursory glance around social media will see prominent clergy - again and again - obsessing on illegal migration. Yet, these same men give only - at best - token opposition to abortion. Very, very interesting. 

Let us conclude with Fr. Thomas Rosica CSB (born in the US, but now a "Canadian"), who is also seemingly addicted to telling Americans how to run their country. Rosica constantly tweets about American politics, but very little about life issues (e.g. abortion etc.) 

I have a question for Fr. Rosica. 

He should tell us if he still has a US passport, and if he used it to trot down to the US Consulate in Toronto to vote for the militantly pro-abortion Hilary Clinton (given that his seeming favourite was knocked out of the running)?

The following is just a recent example of Rosica's "groupie" like fawning over Sanders. Really Fr. Rosica? Are you serious? Do you really agree with Sanders' despicable lie? What about Bill Clintons' 1993 Executive Order overturning previous pro-life efforts? Or, the evil and hateful Executive Orders issued by Barack Obama? 

Friends, Christ is in total control of His Church. Do not despair. Do not be seduced by the devil into sedevacantism. There is no doubt that Francis is the Pope; he is the Pope we deserve. God writes straight with crooked lines; surely we should rejoice in this Papacy, as the poison, the monstrous carbuncle has burst for all to see.

Saturday, 16 September 2017

HOMO-JESUITS: leading dissenters come out supporting James Martin S.J.

Leading Jesuit homosexualists are making official statements of support for dissenter, James Martin. S.J. The following was re-tweeted by Thomas Rosica CSB. 

Where does this sudden explosion of homosexuality and homosexualism come from? In a word: Godlessness. Homosexuality, as with the three other sins that cry to Heaven for Vengeance, is the effect of Godlessness. St. John Chrysostom saw this clearly because he had the Faith; the great saint saw this sin as so evil that he he referred to homosexuality as "hell appearing before its time". Truly no clearer or truer words about this abomination could be spoken. Yet we have evil priests and others who wish to play with the Catechism and remove "disorder", we have others who more openly wish to have the Church accept homosexual acts as "human" etc. 

Dear friends, James Martin S.J. as the following documents attest, has very high and powerful support in the hierarchy of the Church. These individuals know what the Church teachers, yet they reject what the Church teaches. They are modern-day Judases. 

During this time of crisis, it may be opportune for Catholics to re-watch Fr. John O'Connor's "The Homosexual Conspiracy against the Catholic Church". Made in 1991, this video is prophetic. We see how homosexuals were already deeply embedded in the priesthood, destroying, corrupting and perverting the Church; working as agents of the devil. 

Traditional Catholic bishop: "homophilia" is getting homosexuals out of sin !

In contrast to the Homo-Jesuits, the Homo-Dominicans and the Homo-Franciscans with their promotion of a false "homophilia", a true Catholic bishop explains to Catholics that it is in fact the Catholic Church that shows true love towards homosexuals who are caught in this horrifying unnatural vice. 

The Catholic Church does not owe homosexuals or any other person engaged in sin an apology. To the contrary, sinners are bound to beg God forgiveness for their sins. 

As to loving homosexuals: 

What could be more loving than to point out to someone their sin, and to help them get on the way to Heaven? Sadly, we have religious Orders advocating the opposite.

Please pray for the conversion of all those trapped in the "LGBT" so-called lifestyle. 

For further information please visit Joseph Sciambra for the full truth about homosexuality. 

Friday, 15 September 2017

Christian Seno OFM claims opposition to sodomy is "an act of profound violence and sacrilege"

Christian Seno OFM (left) at the "Orgullo Gay" celebration in Mexico.
Photo copyright: Christian Seno (Flickr)

Militant homosexualist and gender ideology activist, Christian Seno OFM, wrote an extensive essay in December of 2016 (on his blog, "Pax et Bonum"), attacking the Catholic Church's position on homosexual and gender ideology. 

The Franciscan, Seno writes the following in a very long and detailed article, entitled "Objectively Disordered - Religious language and LGBT persons": 

Furthermore a reflection on the language used by religion, specifically the Roman Catholic Church, to delegitimize and pathologize homosexual or diverse expressions of sexuality or gender identity will enable us to discern aspects of our faith traditions that render us complicit to acts of injustice and violence.
Seno then goes on to approve of sodomy: 

The Church’s limited view of human sexuality, which is placed at the service of procreation and confined within the boundaries of sacramental marriage, therefore effectively prohibits LGBT persons from expressing the fullness of their humanity by excluding them from participating in healthy, generative relationships and mutual expressions of love.

Seno then proceeds to claim: 

The dichotomization of the LGBT person – the separation of sexual orientation from one’s humanity, of sexual expression from one’s sexuality, and of one’s ability to love from the possibility of being loved by others, by the Church, by oneself, and by God – effectively strips our brothers and sisters of the wholeness that makes them human. This is an act of profound violence and sacrilege, which attacks the very essence of our humanity by undermining the core belief that we are people of intrinsic worth because we have been made in the image of the Divine.

Seno continues: 

In order to do justice for and towards our LGBT bothers and sisters, the Catholic Church must revise its teachings on human sexuality in general and its views on homosexual orientation and gender identity in particular.
Seno then proceeds to outline his solution: 

In order for the Catholic Church to truly rectify its complicity with the violence and injustices leveled against the LGBT community, a wholesale reevaluation of its stance on homosexuality, the dignity of individual persons, and “unjust discrimination” is required.
Seno then calls for a great "coming out" of homosexuals and lesbians in the priesthood and religious life: 

For those of us who are gay and lesbian clergy and religious, an acknowledgement of our own sexual orientation could do much to erode the deep-seated bigotry and internalized homophobia that run through the Church. Perhaps more productive than expectantly waiting for the conversion of the Magisterium, the coming-out of gay Catholic priests, brothers, and nuns can be a major catalyst in challenging the institution’s assumptions about the ontological makeup of the people of God.

Dear friends, this is the same Christian Seno who wishes to make "illegal, "outlaw" the Catholic group, Courage, that ministers to persons with same-sex attraction. Seno's hatred seems to stem from Courage helping men and women who have this disordered attraction to remain celibate. Seno, as we have read, believes that such celibacy is "profound violence" and "sacrilege". Such celibacy is, according to Seno, stripping these people of "the wholeness that makes them human". Dear friends, as a religious, as a Franciscan, it is impossible that Seno does this without the permission of his religious superiors. 

Let there be no mistake, like the Jesuits and the Dominicans, the Franciscan Order has been heavily infiltrated by militant homosexuals, who seek to destroy the Church. They hate Christ they hate purity, they hate marriage, they hate true Christian love. They hate, because they wish to send souls to Hell. 

Pray for the conversion of Christian Seno. 

Wednesday, 13 September 2017

Franciscan Friar declares: "why is climate change denial not yet a crime"?

Ramon "Ramoncito" Razon, a Franciscan Friar of Holy Name Province has declared that "climate change" should be a "crime". Does he want to jail "climate deniers"? Is it one year in jail, Ramoncito? Two, three, four or five? Just tell us how far you wish to go in terrorizing people who dare disagree with you. What do you intend to do with repeat offenders? Send them to a concentration camp? 

Homosexualist dissenters: Ramon (right), and Seno (upper left) 

You will notice that Razon while being very noisy about "climate change" and other eccentric causes is silent about the holocaust, the real world war that is taking place: ABORTION. Interesting, very interesting. 

But this is not the first time that Razon has previously opined in a fascistic manner. Earlier this year (since scrubbed, though unsuccessfully), in an outburst of dissent regarding homosexuality, he waxed openly jabout the Catholic group, "Courage" being "sued". His fellow "Friar" Christian Seno then recommended they be "illegal","outlawed" and "denounced". 

Razon and Seno expressing their hatred for "Courage"

Friar Ramoncito wants doors opened for organizations advocating homosexual behaviour 

Razon is quite the fascist. One wonders how such hateful people can be permitted to become Franciscan Friars? One must conclude that the leadership of the Holy Name Province approve. 

Unfortunately his dissent and hate-filled warped ideas, his grossly immature behaviour on social media did not stop the Franciscan Friars of the Holy Name Province from allowing Razon to take final vows as a Friar. 

This is an outrage!

This is a scandal!

Just how many other dissenting, pro-homosexual and fascistically inclined "Friars" are in this Province? 

Tuesday, 12 September 2017

The Battle of Vienna ~ how King John III saved Europe

September 12, 1683 is one of the greatest days in Polish history. It marked the defeat of the Turkish hordes at the Gates of Vienna, after a long siege by forces of Grand Vizir Kara Mustapha.

The Polish hussars destroyed the Turkish line and following the battle, King John III Sobieski sent a message to Pope Innocent II:"Venimus, vidimus et Deus vicit".

It is a sad reality that most people do not know of this battle. One hopes that in Europe - perhaps at least in Austria and Italy - people will reflect and say a prayer for the brave soldiers who died that day saving their nation from enslavement. 

Had the Turks won the day, the road would have been open to Rome, and in fact the Turks had every intentiom to take Rome. Indeed, the Grand Vezir's had pledged to feed his horse oats on the High Altar of St. Peter's.

Prior to his departure for Austria, King John placed himself and his army in the hands of the Black Madonna at Czestochowa. Remember this great victory and this great man. Remember his faith and his courage.

Monday, 11 September 2017

James Martin S.J. accuses Catholics of being "traditionalist, homophobic, closed-minded..." for not accepting homosexuality

James Martin S.J., in a recent symposium at Fordham University, continues his promotion of homosexuality. Martin then turned his attention to Catholics who actually believe what the Church teaches: that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered and gravely sinful. 

The following video clip shows James Martin S.J. expressing astonishment that "even the most traditionalist, homophobic, closed-minded Catholic cannot look at my friend and say: that is a loving act..." Oh Jim, Are you really telling Catholics that acts that cry to Heaven for vengeance are loving? Guess God made quite a few BIG mistakes. 


The full video is available here, courtesy of Joseph Sciambra. 

Please pray for the conversion of Fr. Martin and all the homosexuals he encourages to remain in sin. 

Sunday, 10 September 2017

Michael Coren attacks Toronto Catholic Witness as "defending the right wing..."

Michael Coren has just singled out Toronto Catholic Witness and Vox Cantoris as two blogs that "carry a heavy mark" in influencing the social and political life of Canada, vis-a-vis Catholic action. He should have every reason to believe this, as our blogs have grown rapidly in readership and have a worldwide following. We are read in Rome and in the Vatican. It should be noted that our readership  has a much larger circulation than "official" diocesan newspapers (such as The Catholic Register, of the Archdiocese of Toronto; or, for that matter, The Walrus, who published Coren's article). May our influence continue to grow so that our "mark" may be even heavier. Vox Cantoris has provided a powerful rebuke to this foolish and angry man. 

Coren identifies a number of groupings (e.g. think tanks, pro-life activists etc.) constituting "right wing Catholics". Specifically, Coren denotes Toronto Catholic Witness and Vox Cantoris as the most "blatant" of these "zealots". 
Even more blatant than Lifesite are blogs such as the Ontario-based Vox Cantoris and Toronto Catholic Witness, with less significance but still making a heavy mark.
Presumably such "blatant" acts could be The Vox's consistent opposition and accurate exposure of the adulterist clique in Rome who seek to change doctrine via a false pastoral practice? Or, is it The Vox's opposition to unnatural sexual activity being excused and promoted by evil and decadent churchmen? It is obvious that Coren fears the influence of Vox Cantoris. 

Grande promoting the gay agenda to children with
LGBT "flag" accompanied by an effeminate looking male  

Coren then attempts  (utterly failing) to excoriate Toronto Catholic Witness for denouncing parents as evil for taking their children to the sexually perverse shows of Ariana Grande. Are we to presume that Coren approves of taking children to performances that include overt sexual innuendo on stage, the promotion of homosexuality and promiscuity, and the use of extremely vulgar language that encourages young people to engage in illicit sexual activity? I will state again: why have such concern over physical death, but none over eternal damnation? Such parents are objectively evil. Homosexuality is an abomination. 

Two "students" at a St. Mike's event giving Catholic education the "finger"

Not satisfied, Coren then complains that Toronto Catholic Witness stepped forward to oppose the corruptive influence of the Basilians and dissenting faculty at St. Michael's College, which has resulted in the very obvious grave moral slide of the once Catholic College, with its incessant alcohol-riddled partying and  indecent and scandalous events.
In many ways, it’s a battle for the soul and future of the Catholic Church in Canada. Who controls this major Catholic college at the most important university in Canada—the bishops and Cardinal or liberal clergy and lay academics? It’s not irrelevant that immediately after this story became public, the blog Toronto Catholic Witness ran a long entry defending the right-wing at St Michael’s and accusing the college of being home to lewd sexual behaviour.
Coren can rest assured that more material will be published further exposing St. Michael's College as un-Catholic, and defend Cardinal Collins' right to take control of the College and restore Catholic education. 

To conclude, I will say this. 

Toronto Catholic Witness and Vox Cantoris are neither right nor left. This is not about politics, this is about the Truth. 

We are Catholic. Plain and simple. 

We strive to follow Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Church. He is the Way, the Truth and the Life. 

Please pray for Michael Coren and all those who have rejected or have never  known Jesus Christ and His Truth. 

Saturday, 9 September 2017

St. Michael's College Frosh Week: A shocking display of vulgarity and barbarism!

St. Michael's College  at the University of Toronto presents itself as Catholic. Is it? I have reviewed two lewd events: "Cowboys and Schoolgirls", and "Toga" that are a grave insult to Our Lord. Today, I present a number of screenshots that are illustrative of St. Mike's shameless promotion of a so-called "frosh week". Filthy, dirty, vulgar, obscene. 

Recently, President David Mulroney excoriated the College for lax and disgraceful behaviour, highlighting the orgiastic "Cowboys and Schoolgirls".  Rather than defend him, a number of prominent faculty - including priests - defended St. Mike's. Let readers be the judge if the President is correct. 

Vulgarity, obscenity, drinking, indecency seem to be the order of the day at St. Mike events. 

When his Eminence Thomas Cardinal Collins approached Rome to reassert control of the College from the dissenting Basilian Order, sadly - but not unsurprisingly - the Romans defended the Basilians whose lax influence has allowed a permissiveness across campus that is a grave scandal for the Faithful. 

This action by Rome is a grave insult to the Cardinal Archbishop of Toronto. Please keep His Eminence in your prayers. Please also pray for these deluded young people who have been led astray by their parents, teachers, and yes: their priests. 

Thursday, 7 September 2017

Motor City Madman? George Weigel and "turbo-charged" Alpha Evangelization in Detroit

George "Turbo" Weigel neo-con Americanist

George Weigel is a liberal Catholic. This fact, I have pointed out on a number of occasions. More recently, I have proven that Weigel and Fr. Antonio Spadaro S.J., actually hold to the same liberalism, though most Catholics believe they oppose each other. They do not. They may disagree on minor tactical issues, but both agree on the same fundamental issue: the social Kingship of Christ is wrong, and is not to be advocated and defended as Catholic doctrine. Both men strongly advocate the separation of church and state, a false masonic principle that is condemned by the Church. It is a principle that is the centre-piece of religious indifferentism, placing the one true Faith on equal footing with false religions. 

Popes such as Gregory XVI, Pius IX, Leo XIII, Pius X would all recognize in Weigel a liberal Catholic. Following the rise of Modernism, Pius XI warned Catholics about social Modernism, that is, a Catholic who though still professing Christ's Divinity etc., would seek to divide Catholic social teaching from Catholic doctrinal teaching. The Catholic Faith is a private affair, Catholicism may be one of the voices in the "free" market square of opinion, and so on.

In the United States this liberal Catholicism was given a great boost by John Courtney Murray, one of the main architects of Dignitatis Humanae (on Religious Liberty) at the Second Vatican Council. With a stroke of the pen, Paul VI (a disciple of Jacques Maritian's deluded "integral humanism") and the vast majority of church fathers attempted to erase over 200 years of papal teaching on the Social Kingship of Christ.

The Catholic ideal of the State being permeated with Catholic morality, with the State harmoniously legislating according to Catholic Truth, with the officials of the State offering public homage to Christ - all that was dragged down and trampled underfoot.

In an earlier post I wrote, I encouraged readers to explore Weigel's writings to see the horror of his liberalism. Weigel, like all the high-tax bracket, leading lights in "Beltway Catholicism" are reeking with the stench of Americanism. 

Weigel, for some reason has now decided to involve himself with the local Church in the Archdiocese of Detroit. Weigel, is on record as stating that the "new evangelization" is bringing, and will bring even greater fruits to the Detroit area. The problem is, George Weigel has a track record of making very bad predictions and very foolish remarks. From the Iraq War, to claiming Leo XIII led the charge for separation of church and state and liberalism, to portraying Bill Clinton as bringing morality back to America - in each and every one of these, George Weigel has been dead wrong. 

LIkewise, Wiegel will be wrong on "Alpha" evangelization. It is not that Weigel is a stupid man, but that he is a man who has built his intellectual foundations on liberalism, on Americanism. His philosophy founded on error, will breed erroneous results. A full review of Weigel's errors is presented by the erudite Michael Voris. As previously mentioned, Michael has the sad distinction of being probably the only American Catholic layman who has consistently denounced the errors of Americanism. 

To conclude, George Weigel's fantasy of a "turbo-charged" church is more than likely to end its days like the GM Volt: all revved up and no where to go. Just as his prediction about the greatness of the Iraq War has ended in an un-ending bloodbath resulting perhaps in the death of a million people; most civilian. Perhaps it is time for George Weigel to go away. 

Please pray for the Catholics of the Archdiocese of Detroit. 

Latin Mass for Feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary

Dear friends, tomorrow, Friday, September 8 is the Feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary. 

A Solemn Latin Mass will be celebrated at St. Mary's Polish Roman Catholic Church, in the west end of Toronto. 

This Feast is also the patronal feast day for St. Mary's Parish. Please attend and bring your family and friends. God bless Fr. Kazimierz and all his parishioners.

Tuesday, 5 September 2017

COMMUNIST, HOMOSEXUAL, FREEMASON? How to identify subversive priests

What are the signs that your priest could be subversive? A Communist, a homosexual, a freemason? 

There are signs that the discerning Catholic can carefully use to be on alert for a subversive priest. Fr. John O'Connor, himself driven out of the Dominican Order by militant homosexuals, calls our attention to a number of things we should be wary of, when accessing our parish priest. 

In this day and age, Catholics need to be absolutely certain their priest is not subversive. 

One other key marker as to "where your priest is coming from", is the attitude your priest has towards, "Courage", the courageous Catholic ministry towards poor suffering homosexuals. 

Does your priest have contact information for Courage? Does he support them? If he doesn't, speak to him and tell him he should be actively promoting the faithful Courage apostolate. If he rebuffs you, this is all you need to know. Get out of that parish and take as many Catholics with you. 

Saturday, 2 September 2017

The USA and Antonio Spadaro: why is the reaction so Americanist?

The blasphemous attempt to unite Christ with Freemasonry

The world has heard enough of the so-called "rights of man." Let it hear something of the rights of God. 
Leo XIII, Tametsi

The moment Fr. Antonio Spadaro S.J., and La Civilta Cattolica published, there was a response from Catholics in the United States that was - and remains - quiet frankly, very disappointing. 

The reaction was liberal Catholicism: Americanist. Very Americanist. From ALL sides. 

Many voices joined in one chorus: from the "traditionalist" blog, Rorate Celi,  to prominent Beltway neo-cons such as George Weigel and the disgraced ex-priest Thomas Williams, the response was the same: Our Lord Jesus Christ will not rule over the United States of America. The "First Amendment", religious liberty, separation of Church and state takes priority over the Gospels. Her shall not reign!

Fr. Raymond de Souza, (a Canadian priest) even got involved, trying to come to the rescue of his neo-con friends. He rephrased the Americanist argument in this way, writing in the Knights of Columbus', neo-modernist, Crux

Who are “those who profess to be Catholic” who “dream of a theocratic type of state”? What journals expound their thoughts? In what faculties do they teach? What books have they written? What movements does their thought animate? None of that exists.

Fr. de Souza being an intelligent man must have read from the writings of Popes from Pius VI onwards. Yet, he is silent about these popes. Why? Let us explore perhaps the reason. 

One voice of the papal voices who a priori strongly disagreed with Fr. de Souza, and, as it were drew together all the prior papal teachings regarding the poison of liberalism was Pope Leo XIII. The holy pope in Tametsi wrote:

"Therefore the law of Christ ought to prevail in human society and be the guide and teacher of public as well as of private life. Since this is so by divine decree, and no man may with impunity contravene it, it is an evil thing for the common weal wherever Christianity does not hold the place that belongs to it. When Jesus Christ is absent, human reason fails, being bereft of its chief protection and light, and the very end is lost sight of, for which, under God's providence, human society has been built up".
Or, from Libertas:
"... civil society must acknowledge God as its Founder....justice therefore forbids, and reason itself forbids, the State to be godless; or to adopt a line of action which would end in godlessness - namely, to treat the various religions (as they call them) alike, and to bestow upon them promiscuously equal rights and privileges".
However, Leo XIII and other inconvenient papal teachings have long been forgotten by the Beltway establishment Catholics within "traditionalism" and "conservatism" in the United States.  Historically, from day one, even as the ink was drying on the Masonic US Constitution, the bishops were performing mental cartwheels to try to prove the impossible, that Catholicism is compatible with the masonic philosophical foundations of the United States. 

Rather than address freemasonry's perverse influence, Fr. de Souza,  continues his article: "But there is Michel Voris and his Church Militant site."

Sadly, Fr. de Sousa is correct. I may be wrong, but there is one voice in the wilderness in all of this: the much maligned and mocked, Michael Voris. Michael is the only prominent Catholic in America who has the Catholic "guts" to stand up and literally say the truth: the separation of church and state is garbage and totally un-Catholic. 

Raymond de Sousa then proceeds himself to mock Michel Voris: 
Perhaps Michael Voris is successful, but only a vast ignorance of the American Catholic scene would consider Church Militant to be influential, let alone representative. Voris has been forbidden to use the name “Catholic” in his ventures, and just last week was asked to leave the Convocation of Catholic Leaders in Orlando, American Catholicism’s largest such recent gathering.
What de Sousa fails to mention is that the USCCB actually had signs up in the Orlando, Florida hotel (where they were hoding another meeting), identifying Michael Voris and Christine Niles, and that these two, if seen, were to be physically removed from the building. Such is the hatred and fear of Church Militant by the very wealthy, powerful Beltway, modernist Catholic establishment. An establishment that "conservative" de Sousa, happily aligns with. 

One might begin to ask, just what role do the extremely wealthy Knights of Columbus play in all of this? Well, for starters Carl Anderson too is another very high tax-bracket neo-con Beltway Catholic. There is your answer. 

Is God writing straight with crooked lines by using the psychologically ill Pope Francis and the gang who control him to actually expose the elite Beltway establishment whose idea of Catholicism is some revival of 50s Catholicism? All lace, incense, elaborate liturgies, beautiful buildings interwoven with religious liberty, pluralism, the "First Amendment". In other words, pure unadulterated Americanism. These people simply do not realize that compromising with Freemasonry is destroying the Catholic Church. 

The Americanist "traditionalists" and "conservatives" may cheer on Poland from the sidelines when the Polish Sejm declared Jesus Christ as King of Poland, but King of the United States? The contradiction is riveting. Opposing Freemasonry is a question of truth, not geography, nor "my country, right or wrong". 

The "First Amendment", pluralism, religious liberty - all sacred cows of Freemasonry must remain. "Beltway Catholicism" reigns supreme. Be it "traditional", "conservative", or "liberal". There is absolute unity in supporting, defending the un-Catholic and masonically inspired principle of religious liberty.

However, think again dear friends. Everything must always be seen through the eyes of God. Our Lord Jesus Christ did not come to earth, to suffer, to die an agonizing death on the Cross for religious liberty, for pluralism, for the Catholic Church to be placed "ignominiously on the same level as false religions and even Jewish perfidy" (Pius VII).