Carlo Capella: Vatican pedophile-porn priest wrote dissertation on priestly celibacy!

Carlo Capella: the Face of Evil 

Monsignor Carlo "Carn Evil" Capella, Vatican senior diplomat to the United States presently being sought by both Canadian and American authorities for accessing, possessing, and distributing child pornography is now residing in the Vatican. The Canadian arrest warrant can be read here. 

The story about this vile creature gets worse. "Carn Evil" Capella is such a deceptive liar and fiend, that he dared to write a scholarly paper on priestly celibacy in 2003. Italian readers may review news out of Italy. 

Let us not be deluded, one does not suddenly take up the vice of child pornography. Was Capella already accessing child porn 15 years ago? Was he accessing pornography as a seminarian? Just where did he study before he was at the Pontifical Lateran University?  Were his seminary professors consumers of pornography as well? 

Catholics in Canada well remember another filthy, dirty, vile consumer of child porn: the demonic Raymond Lahey. This blogger (I still retain all emails to prove my case) had to actually write to the CCCB to implore them to remove his lectures and sermons. So cold hearted, so detached from suffering, so inconsiderate towards the innumerable children who were being raped and tortured in images viewed by Lahey that it never crossed the minds of those who control the CCCB to remove Lahey's speeches. 

Just how many images of innocent little children does this vile creature have? Thousands, like the demonic Lahey? It is to Canada's shame that after conviction, Lahey was not hung by the neck until death. 

Friends, we Catholics need to know WHY Carlo "Carn Evil" Capella was in Windsor. 

Why would a high ranking Vatican diplomat need to physically go to small town Windsor, Ontario? The town has about twenty churches. 

What was this pornographer doing in Windsor? Where was he staying? Was he invited by a churchman? If so, who invited him, and why? 

At which church did he download and then distribute child pornography? Let us not be fools. Capella is accused of distributing child pornography. That means be belongs to a network - no doubt international and very powerful - of child abusers. These fellow child abusers, are not butchers, bakers and candle-stick makers. Nor are they your local factory hand, green grocer or, for that matter, accountant or school teacher. 

Make no mistake: "Carn Evil" only moves in the highest circles, his child abusing friends are jet-setters, powerful people, highly placed in the Church and in civil life. Probably he sent the images of children being raped and tortured to powerful clergy, wealthy businessmen, politicians, diplomats, celebrities. These are the kinds of people this evil, wicked demon associates with. 

I am a man who gives a person a second chance. 

For Carlo Capella there can be no second chance. 

He should be tried, and if found guilty: hanged.  

BREAKING: Cardinal Burke re-appointed to the Apostolic Signatura

Raymond Cardinal Burke has been re-appointed to the Apostolic Signatura by Pope Francis today, September 30, 2017. 

Cardinal Burke is a humble and holy man. He is an obedient man, who obeys his superiors if they do not command him to sin. That also includes the Pope. 

No doubt, there will be attacks upon him for accepting this re-appointment. No doubt there will those who will argue that the Cardinal is being re-appointed to effectively "bell the cat". No doubt, there will be those who will claim the Cardinal is a sellout, a traitor, a modernist and barely, if not even a Catholic. 

One cannot dispute in an intelligent and logical manner with such people. They are imbued with a false sense of the Church and are, fundamentally in spirit, protestant. 

Pray for Cardinal Burke. Pray for the Pope. Pray for the Church. Pray too, that you are not filled with hatred, bitterness, a loss of faith that Christ is in total control of His Church. Never forget that God writes straight with crooked lines! 

RCMP seeking to arrest pedophile-sodomite Monsignor who has fled to the Vatican

The now notorious Monsignor Carlo Capella, who fled the United States after a warrant for his arrest was made known by American Authorities, is also being sought by Canadian authorities for three specific crimes, relating to child pornography. Vox Cantoris is to be congratulated for exposing this horror to Catholics and men and women of good will.   

Catholics needs to ask themselves SERIOUS questions about charge number "Three". To DISTRIBUTE child pornography. 

Just to whom was Capella distributing child pornography? Cardinals, bishops, priests? It is very likely that this evil and sick man was sending child pornography to other churchmen. Why was this pervert in Windsor? What reason would a Vatican diplomat have in being in the obscure diocese of London, Ontario? 

Who are these fellow porn "priests"? Are they prominent? Just how powerful, influential and high ranking are these child porn Judas-priests?!

Friends, the less you hear about this from the "official Catholic" media, should tell you who is controlling this media. If churchmen are silent on this, we need to ask "why". Why would churchmen be silent on child pornography? 

A Canada-Wide arrest warrant has been issued for Carlo Capella, a 50-year-old male, for the charges of:

• Access Child Pornography
• Possess Child Pornography
• Distribute Child Pornography

Capella has ties to the United States, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, and Italy.

The Windsor Police Service Internet Child Exploitation (ICE) Unit is a member of the Provincial Strategy to protect children from Sexual Abuse and Exploitation on the Internet. This project has been made possible by a grant from the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services.

Anyone with information is asked to contact Windsor Police Service at 519-255-6700 ext. 4896, Crime Stoppers anonymously at 519-258-8477 (TIPS), or online at www.catchcrooks.com.

"Filial Correction" is a false flag as Vatican Banking gets even more murkier....

 "...when worldly men think they see the Church buffeted and almost capsized in the raging storm, then she really comes forth fairer, stronger, purer, and brighter with the luster of distinguished virtues".

Pius X, Editae Saepe

A twenty-five page document, signed by mostly individuals from 3rd, 4th and 5th rate universities alleging to "correct" the Pope, is making a bit of a stir, even in the secular press. Some of the individuals who have signed this document are not even theologians. The claim that this document is some sort of major earthquake shaking the Church, and that it will incommode the Pope (or, to be more precise, the men who control this man), is absolute nonsense. 

The Catholic Church is Monarchical and Hierarchical. Such is the Will of Christ. The Church is not a democracy, even if it means petitioning and voting for the Truth. Even the title is wrong: a Pope, at best - I repeat - at best ! - can be accused, but he cannot be corrected. For a correction implies a priori that the Pope is wrong. Ah, but his heresy is "self-evident", the new saviours of the Church cry! Self-evident it may be to them, but they do not possess the charism of infallibility. It is for the Church to judge. For a future Pope and Council. 

The First Vatican Council provides us with a supernatural solution to the present crisis: a Pope can openly profess apostasy and heresy and then formally defect from the Church, or he will die in Office and be judged by a future Pope and Council. Catholics should carefully and prayerfully study the recent interview granted by Raymond Cardinal Burke. Sadly, a number of Catholics - grossly ignorant of the Faith, and professing a protestant spirit - denounce the Cardinal only outdoing their ignorance with their arrogance. 

Pope Pius X wrote of the Church: 

In fact, only a miracle of that divine power could preserve the Church, the Mystical Body of Christ, from blemish in the holiness of Her doctrine, law, and end in the midst of the flood of corruption and lapses of her members. Her doctrine, law and end have produced an abundant harvest. The faith and holiness of her children have brought forth the most salutary fruits. Here is another proof of her divine life: in spite of a great number of pernicious opinions and great variety of errors (as well as the vast army of rebels) the Church remains immutable and constant, “as the pillar and foundation of truth,” in professing one identical doctrine, in receiving the same Sacraments, in her divine constitution, government, and morality. This is all the more marvelous when one considers that the Church not only resists evil but even “conquers evil by doing good.” She is constantly blessing friends and enemies alike. She is continually striving and ardently desiring to bring about the social and individual Christian restoration which is her particular mission in the world. Moreover, even her enemies benefit from it.

However, the real news is the forced resignation of another Vatican Auditor. 

Just how deeply does this Vatican money laundering go? Just how deeply is the vatican penetrated and compromised with international Freemasonry? Just how corrupt is the IOR and its financial dealings? 

A Prayer for Pope Francis

While the devil may assign one or two demons to each of us, to the Pope he will assign a Legion of Demons..... 

Pray dear friends for Pope Francis..... 

HOMO-FRANCISCANS: Holy Name Province and "LGBT" propaganda

In August, I published a number of very disturbing screen shots on the public Facebook pages of Ramoncito Razon and Christian Seno, both of the Franciscan Friars of Holy Name Province. Razon and Seno were pushing a very radical homosexualist agenda. More recently, Razon opined about making "climate change denial" a "crime". 

A recent review of these same Facebook pages shows a number of changes that would indicate that the Friars who run the Holy Name Province are intent on covering up any scrutiny and exposure of this "LGBT" propaganda. All the homosexualist propaganda has been scrubbed. No matter, readers may view the outrageous dissenting material here. 

The following are a number of screenshots of Ramon "Ramoncito" Razon's Final Vows at St. Francis of Assisi church, becoming a full member of the dissenting homosexualist Franciscan Province of the Holy Name in New York City. 

My, my what have we here? 

The sad and pathetic Fr. James Martin S.J. lecturing on homosexuality at the Church of St. Francis! 

Pope Francis and Cardinal Burke: one does not answer schism with schism

Pope Francis and the Church

In the wake of those who are denouncing Cardinal Burke for not falling into schism, given his recent interview with an Australian news agency, I post a reply to the temptation of schism taken from the writings of the late Abbe de Nantes. 

If someone can point out any defects in the Abbe's logic, then I shall join them in their schism, until then, I will remain at my Mother's bedside and will not abandon the Church - neither in spirit, nor in fact. 

 May Catholic charity always triumph in our hearts  ! One does not answer schism by schism. In the face of ill-feeling, partiality and hatred which raise barriers and trenches, our only answer must be that of love, that love which is founded on the infrangible community of the sacramental life. 

The Church is the charity of Christ spread and communicated amongst all the brothers. Whilst our brothers maintain albeit only the appearance of belonging to the Church, we must hold and retain them in Catholic charity without accepting their ostracism and their scission, and without adding our own thereto. 

If we quit the community, if we emancipate ourselves from hierarchical authority and reject its jurisdiction, we reinforce the schism, we provide it with the homogeneous consistency of a sect, and we give it a free hand in the Church  ! We must stay put, resigned to being punished, to suffering and to obeying whatever is not forbidden or intolerable, as martyrs for Catholic Unity and Charity… We must reject everything that is commanded for the purpose of subversion and not let ourselves be penalised without protesting. But never, never ever, will we contest the unique inviolable power of jurisdiction that belongs to the Pope and to the bishops united to him. Even though they behave unjustly, it is they who are the Catholic hierarchy, not ourselves.

 One cannot save the Church by building on other foundations. But some people wanted to persuade me to do just that. As someone unjustly (although legally) deprived of all power of jurisdiction over souls by a Pope and bishops suspected of schism and heresy, I was supposed to consider myself a victim of persecution and to attribute to myself some kind of extraordinary jurisdiction directly derived from God  ! The determining factor was meant to be the pressing necessity of souls who were in danger of perishing in a Church that had completely lost her direction. 

Well, my answer to this was  : never, not at any price. Such jurisdiction has never been recognised by the holy canons except in the case of bishops in countries where persecution has totally destroyed or paralysed the local hierarchy. Presuming on the assent of the Holy See, these bishops would exercise this kind of extraordinary jurisdiction to save these Churches from total ruin and to provide for the urgent necessities of souls (Dom Gréa, L’Église, p. 235-238). As none of this can be verified in my own case, the usurpation that is proposed to me would be invalid, criminal and strictly schismatic.

We are not the saviours of the Church. Rather it is she, both now and always, who is our salvation. I may not actually see this, but I believe it with an unwavering faith  : the salvation of the Church today, as yesterday and for all times, is to be found in her Pastors. Although temporarily sunk in the error and sectarianism of their Reform, this grace still subsists in them, indefectibly. It may not be apparent, but it is ready on the day appointed by God to spring forth again for the salvation of all. The disorder may be great, the damage to souls mortal, but God does not wish to govern us except through the hierarchy. In such a sacred matter He cannot tolerate any fraudulent usurpation. If we were foolish enough to imagine that we could save the Church by carrying her off with us into the escapade of yet another schism, we who are nothing, it is we and we alone who would be irremediably lost. The only life we have within us is that which we have received. It is from the Roman Rock alone that this life springs forth.

The Church does not lie within us. It subsists in those very men whom we see busying themselves in her ruin and whom we nevertheless believe, by virtue of their apostolic jurisdiction, to be the bearers of Christ’s grace. We ourselves have no share in their powers of order and ministry except in the exact extent to which they delegate it to us. Thus, I am recognised as having the power to celebrate the Holy Mass, and this would be the case even if I were to be punished by an unjust excommunication (which God forbid  !), provided that I then celebrate it in private and without the risk of scandal. 

I also retain the power to give absolution to those who are dying… I give thanks to the Church for these faculties which she allows me to keep. I make use of them and I will continue to do so. But to go beyond this would be to build a simulacrum of the Church outside the Church. Good heavens  ! What would be the point  ? To deceive myself into thinking that I could save everyone  ? Ah, no  ! When the schism of this Reform is over, I do not wish to be separated from the Church. 

An American Prophet responds to James Martin S.J.

I am constantly amazed how few people know about Joseph Sciambra. I am likewise amazed how so many use his investigative videos into LGBT propaganda within the Church, but do not reference him, do not single out Joseph who truly is a prophetic voice in the wilderness of neo-pagan America. 

How is it possible for this man to have such few Twitter followers? Yet, major websites will dig around in Joseph's video materials and put up trolling and sensational headlines to rack up the statistics. 

Friends, the Gospel of Christ is not spread in this manner. The following two videos are from Joseph and provide his responses as an ex-gay person to the misleading and sinful advice that Fr. James Martin S.J. is giving to people who are struggling with same-sex attraction. 

I would ask each and every one of you to watch these videos, to start to read Joseph Sciambra's website and materials regularly. Please tell your priest, your family and your friends about the man whom I refer to as "An American Prophet". Far more accurately, Joseph is an ex-gay, Catholic prophet for homosexualized America. He is, as he says rightly, "a child of God". Fundamentally, a prophet is one who tells the full and complete truth, even though it is very uncomfortable. That is why there will be increasing attacks upon Joseph by militant homosexuals. These attacks only prove one thing: they fear the truth. 

Finally, as Catholics we need to pray for James Martin and misleaders such as him. We need to pray that he abandon the evil advice he is giving to men and women who are confused with their sexual identity. Perhaps Fr. Martin himself is tortured by the demons of sexual confusion? Perhaps he himself suffers from same-sex attraction? Perhaps he was abused as a boy, perhaps even as an altar boy? Perhaps he was abused by a homosexual predator in the priesthood and this horror has slowly led Fr. Martin to the brink of insanity? Who knows?  God knows. Let us pray for him. 

Let us now listen to Joseph Sciambra address Fr. James Martin S.J., and his grave errors and misleading advice to those suffering the spiritual and mental torment of same-sex attraction. 

CATHOLIC EDUCATION? St. Michael's College is a scandal for the Church in Toronto

From the 2011 Frosh week at St. Michael's College, the University of Toronto. Readers can decide for themselves if these images reflect Catholic education. Catholics understand why His Eminence, Thomas Cardinal Collins wishes to place the school directly under his control, removing it from the neo-modernist cabal that is controlling the Faculty. 

His Eminence is well aware of the evils that pervade St. Michael's. Please pray that the Cardinal succeeds to wrest control from the Basilians, who (unfortunately) are being backed up by the Roman authorities. The Vatican meddling in a Toronto local issue is indeed disgraceful, and un-Catholic. It is  an ironic perversity that at the very time the Pope is seeking to diffuse the Liturgy into a state of complete chaos, by placing it in the hands of national churches (a very protestant concept); he is at the same time backing the neo-modernists who are blocking Cardinal Collins' right as Bishop of Toronto (a very Catholic concept) to control education. 

Pope Benedict XVI, addressing Catholics in England in 2010 spoke of Catholic education in this manner:

As you know, the task of a teacher is not simply to impart information or to provide training in skills intended to deliver some economic benefit to society; education is not and must never be considered as purely utilitarian. It is about forming the human person, equipping him or her to live life to the full – in short it is about imparting wisdom. And true wisdom is inseparable from knowledge of the Creator, for “both we and our words are in his hand, as are all understanding and skill in crafts” (Wis 7:16).

A good school provides a rounded education for the whole person. And a good Catholic school, over and above this, should help all its students to become saints.

Do these images reflect "forming the human person" helping "all its students to become saints"?  
  

BREAKING: Bishop Robert McElroy comes out defending homosexualist propaganda in the Church

Robert McElroy, homosexualist bishop of San Diego 

Bishop Robert McElroy, the Bishop of San Diego has ventured to speak out in favour of Fr. James Martin S.J., pro-"LGBT" book, "Crossing a Bridge". McElroy officially endorsed Martin's book when first published. For a history of the on-going dissent in San Diego, please visit Joseph Sciambra's website for details. 

I shall only highlight a few remarks by McElroy for readers to see that this bishop is a hard-core homosexualist. Readers shoud immediately note that McElroy uses homosexual propaganda by using "LGBT". 

McElroy states: 

He [James Martin S.J.] entered it knowing that the theological issues pertaining to homosexuality constituted perhaps the most volatile element of ecclesial life in U.S. culture.

Do they Bishop McElroy? Are you really telling readers that homosexuality constitutes "the most volatile element of ecclesial life.." If you are correct then you must be also telling us that "most" priest and bishops are themselves homosexuals. Why else would homosexuality be such a big issue, since we know that actual homosexuals in the general population are between 1-3 %? 

Let us move on. McElroy then states: 

The attacks on Building a Bridge tap into long-standing bigotry within the church and U.S. culture against members of the L.G.B.T. community. The persons launching these attacks portray the reconciliation of the church and the L.G.B.T. community not as a worthy goal but as a grave cultural, religious and familial threat. Gay sexual activity is seen not as one sin among others but as uniquely debased to the point that L.G.B.T. persons are to be effectively excluded from the family of the church. Pejorative language and labels are deployed regularly and strategically. The complex issues of sexual orientation and its discernment in the life of the individual are dismissed and ridiculed.

The above needs a little unpacking, as McElroy is mixing falsehood and truth (a typical modernist tactic). Are there individuals who use hateful words towards those suffering from same sex attraction? Yes, there are. However, such individuals are not part of this debate. Further, McElroy is wrong in claiming that there are those who claims homosexuals are to be excluded from the Church. I have consistently argued on this blog that a main reason homosexuality is growing is because unnatural sexual vice is also practiced in epidemic proportions amongst men and women. Even amongst married couples. These couples are gross sinners, but they - just like homosexuals - are not, by their sin, automatically excommunicated from the Church. 

Consider why unnatural sex has spread far and wide, even amongst Catholics. Was it not too long ago that Christopher West, the self-proclaimed expert in the "theology of the body" tried to excuse oral and anal sex? When he was called out he tried to obfuscate, by claiming it was not his cup of tea. However, he never denounced such acts as evil. To my knowledge, he has yet to denounce such abominations. Yet, he is endorsed by "conservative" Archbishop Chaput! But then, this is also the same Archbishop who panders to the false religion of Judaism. 

To return to unnatural vice, such as oral "sex". My understanding is that the vast majority of protestants practice these unnatural vices, once the reserve of prostitutes for wayward husbands. Indeed, even EWTN in one of its Q and A sections on its website promoted oral "sex". What are we to expect from poor people with same-sex attraction when they see married couples profaning the nuptial bed? Such deformation of marriage also led to an explosion in child abuse. We know how child abuse leads straight to homosexuality. Sadly, though, bishops like Robert McElroy are silent on oral and anal "sex" between men and women, silent on contraception, silent on sexual immorality that profanes the marriage act.  

Let us now move onto McElroy's attempt to square the circle. The real question is can there be - as McElroy claims - a "reconciliation of the church [sic] and the LGBT community...." What does Bishop McElroy mean? Is there to be reconciliation between Christ and Belial? Bishop McElroy gives the game away when he speaks of "the complex issues of sexual orientation..." Can we imagine a bishop speaking of "the complex issues of adultery", or "the complex issues of theft" etc.? Here, we see McElroy showing complete disingenuousness and promoting homosexual propaganda. You will also notice that McElroy when he speaks of homosexual activity as a "sin" he addresses it from the perspective of  those who oppose Fr. Martin. Not once, in the entire article does McElroy come out and say it: homosexuality is always and everywhere objectively a grave mortal sin.  

McElroy then goes on to say: 

Chastity is a very important virtue of the Christian moral life. The disciple is obligated to confine genital sexual activity to marriage.

But chastity is not the central virtue in the Christian moral life. Our central call is to love the Lord our God with all our heart and to love our neighbor as ourselves. Many times, our discussions in the life of the church suggest that chastity has a singularly powerful role in determining our moral character or our relationship with God. It does not.

Bishop McElroy you are WRONG! We cannot love God without leading chaste lives. Practicing homosexuals (or for that matter husband and wife who practice oral "sex") are not living chaste lives. 

Chastity is integral, it is absolutely necessary, just as avoidance of murder, rape, or any other grave sin. Chastity therefore has a very deciding role in determining our moral character in our relationship to God. Those guilty of sexual sin will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Do you Bishop McElroy forget the words of St. Paul? Sacred Scripture is very clear: those engaging in illicit sexual activity will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Further, homosexuality is identified in Sacred Scripture as one of the Four Sins that cry to Heaven for Vengeance. One does not get to Heaven on keeping nine out of ten Commandments. 

Let us now review what homosexuals actually do to each other and consider if such behaviour destroys a relationship with God. 

The Battle of Vienna ~ how King John III saved Europe

September 12, 1683 is one of the greatest days in Polish history. It marked the defeat of the Turkish hordes at the Gates of Vienna, after a long siege by forces of Grand Vizir Kara Mustapha.

The Polish hussars destroyed the Turkish line and following the battle, King John III Sobieski sent a message to Pope Innocent II:"Venimus, vidimus et Deus vicit".

It is a sad reality that most people do not know of this battle. One hopes that in Europe - perhaps at least in Austria and Italy - people will reflect and say a prayer for the brave soldiers who died that day saving their nation from enslavement. 

Had the Turks won the day, the road would have been open to Rome, and in fact the Turks had every intentiom to take Rome. Indeed, the Grand Vezir's had pledged to feed his horse oats on the High Altar of St. Peter's.

Prior to his departure for Austria, King John placed himself and his army in the hands of the Black Madonna at Czestochowa. Remember this great victory and this great man. Remember his faith and his courage.

James Martin S.J. accuses Catholics of being "traditionalist, homophobic, closed-minded..." for not accepting homosexuality

James Martin S.J., in a recent symposium at Fordham University, continues his promotion of homosexuality. Martin then turned his attention to Catholics who actually believe what the Church teaches: that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered and gravely sinful. 

The following video clip shows James Martin S.J. expressing astonishment that "even the most traditionalist, homophobic, closed-minded Catholic cannot look at my friend and say: that is a loving act..." Oh Jim, Are you really telling Catholics that acts that cry to Heaven for vengeance are loving? Guess God made quite a few BIG mistakes. 

The full video is available here, courtesy of Joseph Sciambra. 

Please pray for the conversion of Fr. Martin and all the homosexuals he encourages to remain in sin. 

Latin Mass for Feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary

Dear friends, tomorrow, Friday, September 8 is the Feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary. 

A Solemn Latin Mass will be celebrated at St. Mary's Polish Roman Catholic Church, in the west end of Toronto. 

This Feast is also the patronal feast day for St. Mary's Parish. Please attend and bring your family and friends. God bless Fr. Kazimierz and all his parishioners.

COMMUNIST, HOMOSEXUAL, FREEMASON? How to identify subversive priests

What are the signs that your priest could be subversive? A Communist, a homosexual, a freemason? 

There are signs that the discerning Catholic can carefully use to be on alert for a subversive priest. Fr. John O'Connor, himself driven out of the Dominican Order by militant homosexuals, calls our attention to a number of things we should be wary of, when accessing our parish priest. 

In this day and age, Catholics need to be absolutely certain their priest is not subversive. 

One other key marker as to "where your priest is coming from", is the attitude your priest has towards, "Courage", the courageous Catholic ministry towards poor suffering homosexuals. 

Does your priest have contact information for Courage? Does he support them? If he doesn't, speak to him and tell him he should be actively promoting the faithful Courage apostolate. If he rebuffs you, this is all you need to know. Get out of that parish and take as many Catholics with you. 

The USA and Antonio Spadaro: why is the reaction so Americanist?

The blasphemous attempt to unite Christ with Freemasonry

The world has heard enough of the so-called "rights of man." Let it hear something of the rights of God. 

Leo XIII, Tametsi

The moment Fr. Antonio Spadaro S.J., and La Civilta Cattolica published, there was a response from Catholics in the United States that was - and remains - quiet frankly, very disappointing. 

The reaction was liberal Catholicism: Americanist. Very Americanist. From ALL sides. 

Many voices joined in one chorus: from the "traditionalist" blog, Rorate Celi,  to prominent Beltway neo-cons such as George Weigel and the disgraced ex-priest Thomas Williams, the response was the same: Our Lord Jesus Christ will not rule over the United States of America. The "First Amendment", religious liberty, separation of Church and state takes priority over the Gospels. Her shall not reign!

Fr. Raymond de Souza, (a Canadian priest) even got involved, trying to come to the rescue of his neo-con friends. He rephrased the Americanist argument in this way, writing in the Knights of Columbus', neo-modernist, Crux: 

Who are “those who profess to be Catholic” who “dream of a theocratic type of state”? What journals expound their thoughts? In what faculties do they teach? What books have they written? What movements does their thought animate? None of that exists.

Fr. de Souza being an intelligent man must have read from the writings of Popes from Pius VI onwards. Yet, he is silent about these popes. Why? Let us explore perhaps the reason. 

One voice of the papal voices who a priori strongly disagreed with Fr. de Souza, and, as it were drew together all the prior papal teachings regarding the poison of liberalism was Pope Leo XIII. The holy pope in Tametsi wrote:

"Therefore the law of Christ ought to prevail in human society and be the guide and teacher of public as well as of private life. Since this is so by divine decree, and no man may with impunity contravene it, it is an evil thing for the common weal wherever Christianity does not hold the place that belongs to it. When Jesus Christ is absent, human reason fails, being bereft of its chief protection and light, and the very end is lost sight of, for which, under God's providence, human society has been built up".

Or, from Libertas:

"... civil society must acknowledge God as its Founder....justice therefore forbids, and reason itself forbids, the State to be godless; or to adopt a line of action which would end in godlessness - namely, to treat the various religions (as they call them) alike, and to bestow upon them promiscuously equal rights and privileges".

However, Leo XIII and other inconvenient papal teachings have long been forgotten by the Beltway establishment Catholics within "traditionalism" and "conservatism" in the United States.  Historically, from day one, even as the ink was drying on the Masonic US Constitution, the bishops were performing mental cartwheels to try to prove the impossible, that Catholicism is compatible with the masonic philosophical foundations of the United States. 

Rather than address freemasonry's perverse influence, Fr. de Souza,  continues his article: "But there is Michel Voris and his Church Militant site."

Sadly, Fr. de Sousa is correct. I may be wrong, but there is one voice in the wilderness in all of this: the much maligned and mocked, Michael Voris. Michael is the only prominent Catholic in America who has the Catholic "guts" to stand up and literally say the truth: the separation of church and state is garbage and totally un-Catholic. 

Raymond de Sousa then proceeds himself to mock Michel Voris: 

Perhaps Michael Voris is successful, but only a vast ignorance of the American Catholic scene would consider Church Militant to be influential, let alone representative. Voris has been forbidden to use the name “Catholic” in his ventures, and just last week was asked to leave the Convocation of Catholic Leaders in Orlando, American Catholicism’s largest such recent gathering.

What de Sousa fails to mention is that the USCCB actually had signs up in the Orlando, Florida hotel (where they were hoding another meeting), identifying Michael Voris and Christine Niles, and that these two, if seen, were to be physically removed from the building. Such is the hatred and fear of Church Militant by the very wealthy, powerful Beltway, modernist Catholic establishment. An establishment that "conservative" de Sousa, happily aligns with. 

One might begin to ask, just what role do the extremely wealthy Knights of Columbus play in all of this? Well, for starters Carl Anderson too is another very high tax-bracket neo-con Beltway Catholic. There is your answer. 

Is God writing straight with crooked lines by using the psychologically ill Pope Francis and the gang who control him to actually expose the elite Beltway establishment whose idea of Catholicism is some revival of 50s Catholicism? All lace, incense, elaborate liturgies, beautiful buildings interwoven with religious liberty, pluralism, the "First Amendment". In other words, pure unadulterated Americanism. These people simply do not realize that compromising with Freemasonry is destroying the Catholic Church. 

The Americanist "traditionalists" and "conservatives" may cheer on Poland from the sidelines when the Polish Sejm declared Jesus Christ as King of Poland, but King of the United States? The contradiction is riveting. Opposing Freemasonry is a question of truth, not geography, nor "my country, right or wrong". 

The "First Amendment", pluralism, religious liberty - all sacred cows of Freemasonry must remain. "Beltway Catholicism" reigns supreme. Be it "traditional", "conservative", or "liberal". There is absolute unity in supporting, defending the un-Catholic and masonically inspired principle of religious liberty.

However, think again dear friends. Everything must always be seen through the eyes of God. Our Lord Jesus Christ did not come to earth, to suffer, to die an agonizing death on the Cross for religious liberty, for pluralism, for the Catholic Church to be placed "ignominiously on the same level as false religions and even Jewish perfidy" (Pius VII).