Sunday, 18 October 2020

Pope Francis: Papal Scandal and Heresy. What can faithful Catholics do?


He said to him the third time, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” Peter was grieved because he said to him the third time, “Do you love me?” and he said to him, “Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you.” Jesus said to him, “Feed my sheep. 
John 21:17 

[Note: I began this before the lockdown, and with very minimal revisions, completed it today]

Following the issuance of the dogmatic teachings on the very strict limitations of Papal Infallibility, and the Code of Canon Law of 1983 on heresy (unchanged from the 1917 Code), the various theories of papal heresy and the solutions over the past centuries must be viewed henceforth through the lens of Vatican I and Canon Law. For example, the "Bellarmino Solution" or the "Cajetan Solution" and so on must be placed within the context of post-Vatican I dogmatic Church teaching and Canon Law as they pertain to heresy. What may have been possible opinions/theories have ceased after the dogmatic teachings of Vatican I on the visibility of the Church, the role of Peter, and papal infallibility. Catholics must not forget that these opinions/theories were those of private doctors. They are not dogmatic teachings. 

Two contemporary "solutions", that have gained a lot of traction, are not solutions at all. The Sedevacantists argument is: the Pope is a liberal, liberalism is heresy, therefore the Pope is not the Pope. The Modernist apply this same logic from the opposite extreme: the Pope is a liberal, but the Pope is Catholic, therefore we must be liberals. 

There is a Catholic solution: Vatican I and Canon Law. The question of a Pope being a heretic, is in a sense then, besides the point. The scandals, heresies, and schismatic intentions that a Pope can convey do not ipso facto deprive him of the Papacy. In fact, history proves this beyond debate, with heretical (or dabbling with heresy) Popes remaining Popes. 

A huge problem remains for Catholics striving to live holy lives, knowing that to be saved, we must be attached to the visible, hierarchical Church. To break with the Church, is to break with Christ. Outside the Church there is no salvation. 

The problem and question is: obedience. This is a key point, as it is normal and natural for a Catholic to want to obey the Pope. 

Just how does a Catholic navigate the waters of obedience when faced with a Pope who scandalizes, manifests intentions that seem schismatic, and engages in actions and words that seem or could be interpreted as materially heretical? The non-Catholic and emotional reaction is to declare the Pope deposed. An imposter who sits on the Throne of Peter. Here we have a serious problem.  To call the Pope an "antipope" or "heretic" [formal] is to judge a priori without recourse to the Church, the very Church that these rebels claim they are defending! You cannot defend Christ by unlawfully withdrawing filial respect and obedience to His lawful Pastors. The Catholic Church is a Monarchy not a democracy, with Christ as the Head, and the Pope as His earthly Vicar. However, the Pope as Vicar does NOT have absolute powers over the Faithful. One papal title is "servant of the servants of God". We can therefore outline certain parameters that a Pope cannot circumvent: 

The Pope cannot Rule as a Tyrant

Catholic teaching includes dogmatic teachings of the ecumenical councils, which no Pope can change. The Pope, like all Catholics, is also bound by Canon Law, which, without sinning, he cannot on a whim disobey. The Pope can change Canon Law, but he cannot change it so that is is contrary to Faith and Morals. Further, until Canon Law is changed, the Pope, if he violates it sins against the Church, against the virtue of obedience, against charity, and misleads the faithful. We know this from common sense: if the Mayor in a city speeds, he is breaking the law and should be subject to a fine. Until the law is changed, the Mayor cannot exceed the speed limit. Otherwise he acts unjustly, displays a dictatorial bent, and manifests contempt for the citizenry.
 
Violating the law of the Church is far, far graver than the violation of a city ordinance. Simply put, the Pope is not above the Law, even "his" Law.  In fact it is NOT his law, but the Church's, to which the Pope must submit. Otherwise he sets himself up as a despot. 


Obedience to the Pope is not Limitless

St. Paul himself, warns us in Galatians 1:8: "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed". If you had lunch with the Pope, and he asked you to jump out the window at St. Marta's, (or place a beach ball on an Altar), you would be under no obligation to obey him. To the contrary, you would be bound by God's Law to not only reject his proposal, but to admonish him for violating God's Law. The Pope is not some sort of Oracle, a "divine" robot regurgitating every thought of God. This is a damnable heresy that is spread by protestants, ignorant Catholics, and misapplied by both Sedevacantists and Modernists. 

The First Vatican Council reiterates traditional Catholic teaching that binds the papal hands regarding touching Catholic Dogma and Tradition (related to dogma and doctrine). The actions, statements, pronouncements, ad hoc chit chat, telephone calls, interviews with this or that journalist, must always be placed within the context of Church teaching, otherwise we fall into the madness of the "Talmud-Hadith Thesis". That is, every word and action of the Pope is a "brain dump" from God which minutely regulates the lives of Christians. This is what has become to also be known as "papolatry". 


The Question of Evil Popes

In Governance and Discipline, according to the same Council, the Pope has supreme and universal jurisdiction. However, many papal acts of governance are reversed, overturned, and modified by successors, precisely because they do not pertain to doctrine. Further, acts of Governance and Discipline must be for the pastoral good of the Church. A number of Popes who abused their authority and perverted the justice of good governance in the service of the Gospel can be cited. For example, Paul IV, Alexander VI, and other renaissance popes ruled as despotic princes, and committed grave sins of uncharity and injustice. Some Popes have been elected through simony. Even a simoniacal man who seizes the Throne of Peter through evil means, once recognized by the Church, becomes Pope (e.g. Julius II, Alexander VI), for God will not allow His Church to be headless. Though the First Lateran Council declared prelates who engaged in simony to lose  Office: “‘Following the examples of the Holy Fathers’ and renewing the duty of our office ‘we forbid in every way by the authority of the Apostolic See that anyone by means of money be ordained or promoted in the Church of God. But if anyone shall have acquired ordination or promotion in the Church in this way, let him be entirely deprived of his office.'” (Denz. 359), it did not apply to men who were once recognized as Pope, as my two examples above illustrate. 

Besides the grave sin and crime of simony some Popes have fathered children, others have committed murder and other crimes. Who can forget the active homosexual, rapist, murderer, simoniacal Benedict IX? However, like the heretical popes, these men, still to this day, are listed as Popes. Along with heretical Popes, evil Popes also remain Popes.


Pope Francis 

So we come to Pope Francis, a man who it cannot be denied has abused his Office, created scandal such as his promotion of men gravely suspect of heresy into the episcopate, met and embraced two homosexuals he met whilst on his visit to the United States, the protection/promotion of known homosexuals in the curia, coverup in the de facto international pedophile gang. 

He has also engaged in remarks and actions that are very grave causes for concern. I shall only cite a few examples of documented facts, not gossip or rumours. Examples include: his official renunciation of preaching the Gospel to Jews. His refusal to preach the Gospel to Moslems, Buddhists and others. Equivocation on the existence of Hell (which incidentally has been causing consternation amongst the separated brethren), the contradictory obfuscations in Amoris Laetitia. More recently we have the Amazon Synod working Document that also contains the following: No. 121: "the Spirit of the Lord has taught these peoples [Amzonian animists] throughout the centuries faith in the God Father-Mother Creator...") etc. Most recently we have his scandalus "Tutti fratelli" document that mixes truth, falsehood, innuendo, politics, and subtle gossip into a unpalatable stew of spiritual poison.


Is Francis a Punishment from God? 

However he remains the Pope. Why? Why does God allow a man who refuses to preach the Gospel to Jews, Moslems and others; who is and is permitting error and confusion to be sown in the Church, to be on the Throne of Peter?  Perhaps as a just punishment from God on His Church which has been, and continues to be grossly disobedient? Who can deny that a just punishment should not be meted out on the vast majority of Catholics who rejected Humanae Vitae, or ignored it, or even indirectly contributed to the error by  believing (and living it) it themselves but not teaching it to family members? 

Jesus Christ took marriage very seriously. He upbraided the Jews for their issuing divorce certificates. The spirit of the Judaizers (the very original heresy) was already rampant in the 1960s. We saw it reappear during the recent Synod on the Family when one high ranking Prelate preferred the abrogated Law of Moses to the living Law of Christ. Let us not forget the warning of St. John Eudes, who said that when God permits evil priests, it is a sure sign that God is angry with His Church. 

Who cannot deny that over the decades, and even well before the Second Vatican Council, the Church was already committing adultery with the World? Who can deny that Catholics are in need of scourging for being so lukewarm, so engrossed in sin? Just look at the use of contraception, the abortion rates, the explosion in pornography, the support for sexual deviancy amongst Catholics.  God has every reason to be outraged with Catholics who are openly mocking His Law. The price for infidelity, as reflected in the Old Testament, is constant scourging by God, and the final deportation into slavery in Babylon for the unfaithful Israelites. Let there be no mistake, our countries, our cities, our very parishes are modern "Babylon". 

Throughout this mysterious crisis, let us not forget that Jesus Christ remains in absolute control as the Lord of History.  He permits the Pope to still remain the Pope. For as all powerful, He could strike the Pope dead today, if He so decided. Francis remains on the Throne for a reason known to God, just as the High Priest Caiaphas remained on the "seat of Moses" whilst he was organizing the greatest blasphemy and crime in history: Deicide. Yet Our Lord did not depose him, but recognized Caiaphas as the head of the Jewish Church (at that time the one true religion, until they rejected and crucified the Messiah) until the Sacrifice was Offered on the Cross. When, and only when the Curtain of the Temple was rent in two was the Old Covenant abolished and the Church born out of the blood and water from Christ's side to become the new Israel, led at that time by a tiny remnant of faithful Jews. The rest had fallen away into apostasy. 

Loyalty to Christ through Loyalty to the Church 

Let us return now to the question of obedience to the Popes that Jesus Christ permits to sit upon the Throne of Peter. As I have tried to outlined above, when a Pope diverges from what he is bound as Pope to teach and defend, we are not bound to obey. The Pope as bishop is also a private doctor.  Archbishop Jan Pawel Lenga emphasized this very point last December on Polish television, when discussing the issue of obedience. It must not be forgotten that upon his Episcopal consecration, Jorge Bergoglio professed the following, and when a Catholic respectfully disobeys the Pope, it should be because the Catholic desires the Pope to remain faithful to his promises to Christ. It is not rebellion, but seeking the Pope to reaffirm his faith in Christ:    
With firm faith, I also believe everything contained in the word of God, whether written or handed down in Tradition, which the Church, either by a solemn judgment or by the ordinary and universal Magisterium, sets forth to be believed as divinely revealed.
I also firmly accept and hold each and everything definitively proposed by the Church regarding teaching on faith and morals.
We must love the Church, love the Pope, pray for the Pope, especially for any Pope who may have gone out of his Catholic mind! The words of Our Lord to St. Peter: "Simon, Simon do you love me", also apply to us. Do we love Him? Do we really love Him? Do we love Him enough to trust Him and remain in His One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church? When churchmen like Cardinal Burke, Archbishops Lenga, Vigano and others speak, they do so out of love for the Pope, that he affirm the Faithful in Christ's unchangeable Teachings.  


The Activity of Satan in causing Confusion

Satan is also very active. He loves dissension, confusion and hatred. There is a diabolical temptation to anger, rage, quarreling, private judgment etc. St. Paul warned us, all these come from the Evil One. None of this will reform the Church, but on the contrary, only add to the destruction, and loss of souls. If the Pope does or says something crazy: turn to prayer, to penance. Do not follow him into error,  but also do not rage, do not lead others into confusion. Christ is in control of His Church! It is His Church, and not the Pope's. Remember we are not supposed to be "papolators", are we? But it is also not my Church or yours. It is His. Let us NOT forget that. Failure to recognize this is to place far too much trust in man, and far too little in God. 


Christ is the Head of the Church

It is de fide, that Christ is the Head of the Church. One of the greatest temptations is to abandon the Church because of our revulsion that She has been betrayed into the hands of sinful men. But that would be a catastrophic error. We can choose: will we be like the daughters of Jerusalem, the women at the Cross, or will we run and hide like the Apostles? Or, far worse, will we betray Our Lord and join with Judas to sell out the Church to Caiaphas and other evil men who proclaim daily, "he will not reign over us"? 

Friends, let us remain with the Church as she is abused, raped, sold into prostitution by the very men who should be loving and serving Her. Let us not abandon Jesus, as He is being re-crucified in His Church. Let us not flee to false synagogues of Satan, let us not leave the Church for some nonexistent "church" or sect. To flee is to flee from the foot of the Cross, to abandon Christ to His enemies. Schism, as I have been trying to warn, is no solution at all, but in fact an aggravation of the crisis. To leave the Catholic Church because bad men control the Hierarchy, even the Papacy is pathetic. Did the holy women walk away from the foot of the Cross? 


Our Weapon is Prayer

Have you been to Mass today? [you can see that this was drafted well before the lockout from our churches] Have you visited the Blessed Sacrament? Have you made a good examination of conscience? Have you prayed the Rosary? Have you forgiven your "enemies", those who may have mocked you for staying faithful to Christ's Church? Do you love the Pope? You may not like him but you are commanded by the Law of Christ to love him. If you have hate in your heart, you have Satan there. 

The first step in ending the madness in the Church and the world is that each one of us, in humility recognize our sins, make a good confession, a firm purpose of amendment, and strive to lead holy lives. It means seeking out a priest to whom we regularly make a good confession. This is critically important, as for what is "self-evident" heresy, may actually be us in error. Let us not forget the lesson the Abbe de Nantes taught the dissenting, schismatic priests back in 1969: no one can authoritatively pronounce someone as guilty of heresy. We may - with charity - say someone seems to be suspect, perhaps even guilty of material heresy. But NO one, outside of the Church through Her juridically appointed judges, can pronounce the sentence of formal heresy upon another. To deny this is an act of rebellion and despising the legitimate Authority of Christ through His Ministers. It is implicitly denying Christ as King. 


The Absolute Need for a Spiritual Director

We need to have a spiritual director, who can act as a guide in these tumultuous times. A spiritual director can provide the necessary brake on our natural inclination to pride. The refusal to have a spiritual director, someone whom we obey, is a sure sign of spiritual pride which will only have sad consequences. Critically, the spiritual director can provide essential guidance on how to act and react to the crisis in the Church, so that if and when scandals and heresies arise, we will be guided through the minefield and not be scattered to the winds, with the very heretics we wish to avoid. The Catholic Church functions on Authority, thus we expose ourselves to the grave danger of private judgment without spiritual direction. 

We may also need to make practical reforms in our lives which are leading us, and others into sin. For example, we may have to  give up, change the direction, and/or greatly reduce our social media activity, if our confessor sees it as an impediment to growing in holiness. 

If we cannot reform ourselves, we can hardly reform the Church, even less can we call for reform without being convicted of hypocrisy. Let us do penance, let us pray, let us serve others in our lives, and let us leave the rest to the Holy Spirit. For it is the Holy Spirit who is the True Reformer. May the words of St. Paul be our guide:

"I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith" 
2 Timothy 4:7

Sunday, 20 September 2020

The Archdiocese of Toronto is abusing cognitively impaired people in its Holy Communion "Ban"

 

Cardinal Collins: more confused and desperate 


The ABUSE of Catholics continues unabated with this Sunday being the 180th day since we have been DENIED access to Holy Communion. It is NOT a question of health, as Catholics not under the direct control of Cardinal Collins ARE receiving Holy Communion within the municipal boundaries of the Greater Toronto Area. Further, eastern Catholics, as well as separated eastern brethren, are also receiving in the traditional manner without being abused by the Provincial Authorities or police. 

Let there be no mistake: this outrage is being committed to placate Toronto Public Health, who are being backed by Mayor John Tory and his fellow anti-Christian Council.  When liquor stores, beer stores, and pot shops remained open, Cardinal Collins rather than inform the City that churches would likewise remain open for private prayer and small gatherings for Mass, boarded up our churches lest he face the wrath of the downtown elite and media. "See you in court", and defending Christians' God-given rights do not seem to be high on the Chancery's agenda. 

But the ongoing outrage of denying Catholics rights goes even further. The Cardinal and the Chancery are grotesquely violating predominantly older adults with a cognitive impairment who know no other way of receiving Holy Communion but on the tongue. There are Catholics for whom Holy Communion has been the only way (and rightfully so) they have ever received Our Lord. They cannot cognitively understand and therefore this so-called edict of receiving on the hand is not feasible, for so ingrained is their manner of receiving Holy Communion.  

The result is that cognitively impaired adults are being DENIED Holy Communion. I know this for a FACT, for during the previous H1N1 Holy Communion Scandal my mother was DENIED Holy Communion. She wished to receive Our Lord. I informed her she would have to receive on the hand. She said "yes, yes", when I told her the manner of permitted reception. I went with her to the Communion Rail, but, her impairment was such that she knelt with her tongue out, and after efforts my efforts  to make her understand the changes, he then passed her by like some public sinner. Truly God blessed her on that day for her fidelity to Christ.

This grave evil will have to answered by Cardinal Collins, his "advisors", and the cowardly priest. Pray they repent of their sins, for they will answer to Christ as to why they denied her and no doubt countless others. 

Dear Catholic friends: raise your prayers up today for our beloved elders. Many of whom are not even with family, but locked up in a LTC facility. Contrary to the lies that "we are all in this together", these poor souls suffer in isolation and loneliness. 

Catholic priests: your oath of obedience to the Cardinal does not extend to unlawful and evil commands. I encourage you to cease your cowardice and defend the rights of Catholics.

Friday, 18 September 2020

The Cross stands while the world turns

 

"Then Jesus cried out with a loud voice, and yielded up his spirit. And all at once, the veil of the temple was torn this way and that from the top to the bottom, and the earth shook, and the rocks parted asunder; and the graves were opened, and many bodies arose out of them, bodies of holy men gone to their rest: who after his rising again, left their graves and went into the holy city, where they were seen by many." (Matthew 27: 50-53)

Wednesday, 16 September 2020

John Tory: Toronto's EVIL Mayor was elected by the votes of apostate "Christians"

                 

Toronto's Mayor, John Tory is an evil man. Every day I thank God I was not seduced into soiling my soul by voting for this despicable, twisted creature. Being guilty as a material accessory to the most abominable evils promoted by this man. To be a grave digger of society. 

Now we hear that this wretched creature has just gleefully delighted in another massive waste of taxpayers' money: $760,000 on a billboard with the word "Toronto" emblazoned on it. This is how the City of Toronto spends taxpayers' money when the City is stone broke.

 


 

Tory merely reflects the degenerate electorate. After all, Tory was freely elected. People wanted him. They wanted his degeneracy, and promises of lower taxes (well, really raising your taxes but a penny or two lower than his opponents). In other words, Tory was elected by appealing to base vice, to the materialistic nature of man. In this, John Tory perfectly reflects the evil of the City of Man. It is a selfish man, a godless man, a man without morals, without decency. 

 


But this is still only a superficial view of Tory and his despicable ways. So far, I have but touched on his disregard for the unemployed, those who have lost jobs because of his and City Council's lock downs. It is estimated that 60% of Toronto restaurants will not survive the COVID restrictions come 2021. Family businesses, long held dreams, livelihoods, everything destroyed by this man and his hard-left (and I mean HARD left) City Council enablers and co-conspirators.

You were warned dear friends as to what this man was. But how many of you voted for him? Tory picked up 63% of the vote. The excuse will be: "well, he's the lesser of two, or three, or four evils. Ooh, ooh, ooh...". John Tory must have picked up many a "Christian" vote, for there are at least nominally well over a million "Christians" in the City. Tory could not have won without them. 

 


But it gets worse: MUCH worse. You see, John Tory is not only a pompous, preening popinjay (indeed compared to his evils, that could be said to be his positive side), but a grossly immoral man who OPENLY opposes Christian morality. He does not hide this fact, he is not ashamed of it. On the contrary: his is proud of his advocacy for immorality and attacks on the family. He wants to demolish the family and enshrine evil as virtue. You saw him march, year after year in "Gay Pride Parades". 

 So what evil does John Tory have to support for him to "cross the line" for his "Christian" supporters? Will it be lowering the age of consent, bestiality, some other horror? Or will his supporters continue to make excuses? 

 

 

So one must ask: how can a Christian vote for him? Well, it comes down to a number of things, but I think its nexus is a desensitization and denial of sin. Ultimately, these "Christians" do not really believe. If Jesus really was their King, they could not have voted for a man who openly, eagerly, proudly advocates and promotes one of the sins that cries to Heaven for vengeance. Evidently, the fact that John Tory crossed God's line long ago when he supports these evils is of no consequence for these nominal "Christians". Cherry picking the Bible seems to be very popular these days.

They see no contradiction in perhaps attending religious services, "praying", then marching off and casting a ballot for a man who rejects Jesus Christ. If they really loved and followed Jesus they would heed His commandments. God is Love, yes. But He is also hates sin, and commands that we OBEY Him. "Anyone who rejects me, rejects Him who sent me..." (Luke 10:16). Only a perverse generation could cast a vote for such a wicked man. 

Now many of you, perhaps most will scoff. "Oh Jesus understands, we can vote for an openly evil man, we just want the 'lesser of two evils'" Really? You show me that in the Bible. To the contrary: "no man can do evil that good can come from it. (Romans 3:8). Though it is licit to sometime tolerate an evil to avoid a greater evil or promote a greater good, it is NEVER permitted to do evil that good may come of it (c.f. Humanae vitae, no. 14). Voting for evil politicians is NOT toleration, it is positive action of voting in the belief that a good (e.g. lower taxes, paving roads) will come from supporting object evil. A true Christian understands that there are times when formally refusing the ballot, or not voting are the only morally acceptable choices.   

But you say: "I'll never give in to the Antichrist, I'll be there fighting for the Church, for Jesus". Will you? You who voted for wicked men? You who meekly took to wearing masks as a sign of submission? So if you'll take the mask, believe me, you will take the Mark of the Man of Perdition. 

Be warned of the words of St. Jude:


In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion.They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire... these people slander whatever they do not understand, and the very things they do understand by instinct—as irrational animals do—will destroy them.

Woe to them! They have taken the way of Cain...
They are clouds without rain, blown along by the wind; autumn trees, without fruit and uprooted—twice dead. They are wild waves of the sea, foaming up their shame; wandering stars, for whom blackest darkness has been reserved forever

Saturday, 12 September 2020

The Battle of Vienna was not what the Neocon liars would have you believe

 


Today we mark the anniversary of the victory of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and their allies over the expansionist Turkish Empire. Contrary to popular myth (very aggressively promoted by neocons and their warmonger allies), the clash at Vienna was not a clash between Christianity and Islam. It was a clash to halt the Turkish conquest of central Europe. Illustrative that this was not a "religious war" is reflected in the alliances. It all gets a bit muddled when we find Lipka Tatars fighting for the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth  (the Tatars were held in high esteem by John, who admired their fighting spirit, bravery,  and patriotism), whilst "His Most Catholic Majesty" Louis XIV the "Sun King" was energetically backing the Grand Vizier; merely continuing the Franco-Turkish Alliance of Francis I with Suleiman the Magnificent. "His Most Catholic Majesty" returned to his evil deeds in the late 1680s when he launched the Nine Years War, freeing up his Turkish allies to attack Belgrade and expand into the Balkans. We saw some of the long term effects of this evil in the fratricidal Balkan Wars replete with the neo-pagan forces of NATO bombing Orthodox churches into rubble.

So much for a "crusade" (be it in 1683 or the  90s. Or for that matter the invasion of Iraq, the stealing of Syrian oil in 2020 etc.), so much for Christian witness, so much for "blessed are the peacemakers". Christians would do well to remember this when they are tempted by the devil to hatred. 

We need to go and witness by our life: to every Moslem, Jew, Buddhist, Hindu and other non-believers who come our way. In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven. (Matthew 5:16).

While we are at it, we may find we are a good example to the wayward and nominal Christian. It was Bishop Fulton Sheen who once said that there are so little conversions, because non-believers have yet to meet an authentic Christian. Let us, beginning today, like King John, show that we are authentic Christians.

Tuesday, 8 September 2020

CNN goes all WAR MONGERING CRAZY: Promoting the Evil Madmen Who Want To Rule the World




Ye Hypocrites, are these your pranks 
To murder men and give God thanks
Desist for shame, proceed no further 
God won't accept your thanks for murder. 

Robbie Burns 
 
Sometimes it pays to draft a post and await the right time to publish it. This post was last revised on May 15. With minor revisions, given the recent war mongering fanaticism by CNN in favour of the "military industrial-congressional complex" I felt it time to publish my thoughts. It should be noted that Eisenhower had actually included "congressional" in his draft, but dropped it from his speech after being informed that exposing Congress as part of the war mongering machine would precipitate a crisis. This buying of Congress as shills for the military-industrial complex is a decades long bipartisan reality that is leading the United States to sure ruin.
 
Let us now jump six decades forward and what do we find?   

The latest "controversy" is Trump mentioning the other day "...endless, crazy wars...". Not three months ago, Trump also noted that the United States should not be seeking "...to solve ancient conflicts in faraway lands". Easier said than done however. The devil never rests. 
 
To Trump's credit, he dogged the bullet of war last January. Had the globalist madmen surrounding and goading Donald Trump got their way, the United States would have been involved in a catastrophic major war, followed by the devastating blow of the coronavirus hysteria and following economic collapse. For those who retain a memory, this past January saw Trump being ambushed in his Florida home by a number of neocon fanatics: Mike Pompeo, Jared Kushner, Lindsey Graham et al. Quickly they convinced the President that an Iranian military officer on a diplomatic mission to Iraq needed to be assassinated. The Officer had, it needs to be underscored been invited to Iraq, a supposedly "sovereign" nation. The aspect of diplomacy is crucial. In the closing months of World War Two, when high ranking Nazi Officers entered Allied controlled areas on diplomatic missions, they came and left freely (e.g. von Friedeburg, Wolff etc). It is a rule amongst civilized men not to murder those on diplomatic missions.  But then, civilized men seem to be in very short supply these days.

As with the ill-advised strike on Syria, "evidence" was presented that the Diplomat was preparing "imminent attacks" on four US embassies. Needless to say, here we are four (note: it is now nine months) months later, and no "evidence" has been produced for what would have been the pretext to plunge the United States into yet another disastrous foreign war.

Over that fateful weekend, the various deranged followers of Darbyite sects in the United States (of which Pompeo is a card carrying member) called for war. Maddened "evangelicals" bayed for blood and rejoiced over the killing of the Iranian Officer. In doing so they violated biblical teaching (something they have shown great skill at over the years). If we take the Darbyites at their word that the Iranian diplomat was "indeed wicked", then we must juxtapose their bloodthirsty glee over his death alongside Sacred Scripture: "As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign Lord, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn from their ways and live" (Ezekiel 11:33). Incredibly these crazed sects have seduced grossly ignorant "Catholics", many (probably most) of whom have never actually read the Bible, and therefore are easy prey to swallowing occultist John Nelson Darby's dispensationalist lies and heresy. These people are morally bankrupt and a scandal to Christian witness. 

Why do I mention this? Simply because we now know the backdrop in which this war was being planned. The backdrop was this:

As early as the first week of November 2019, U.S. military intelligence KNEW about a human-to-human pathogen being transmitted in the Wuhan region of China. ABC reported a memo that was prepared by US military intelligence as far back as the first week of November. The Times of Israel reports further details that US military intelligence tipped off NATO and Israeli IDF intelligence. 

We now know that these same governments, having received military intelligence about the pathogen did NOTHING. Why these governments did nothing is another story that involves the secret hand that is manipulating the various nations into a one, world, globalist State. 

What we do know is that in January the President of the United States was being lured into a major mid-east war, all the while military intelligence KNEW that a potentially disrupting pathogen was on the loose, and coming to America and Europe. 

Can you IMAGINE what it would have been like had the US gone to war against Iran; a country five times bigger than Iraq, a population of over 80 million; with an indigenous military industrial base, and highly skilled at unconventional warfare? It would have been a military and economic disaster. All was so perfectly timed, just as the virus was appearing on the horizon. Surely this evil plot by globalists was designed to bring down the United States.
.
The results: the Middle East in flames, the petroleum industry destroyed, a pandemic (real or fake, the effect would be the same based on lockdowns), economies shattered (beyond what we have now), prices skyrocketing. The question always arises: QUI BONO?

I constantly remind myself of the wise words of the late Fr. John O'Connor. "The enemy is not over in Moscow, or Peking, it's right here in Washington D. C".   And the people in Washington are certainly not working for America. They are working for a one, world, government. A godless, anti-Christian State. They are also very much aware that war can hasten the ruin of nations and usher in a new polity.
 
CNN just once again proved Fr. O'Connor correct. The question is, how long can Donald Trump resist these evil globalist malefactors who infest the intelligence agencies, the military, the spy agencies, Wall Street, the media...?  We see another reflection of how diabolical they are in the near universal silence in the persecution of Julian Assange and his expose of war crimes.
 
In all of this the Russians have been carefully watching and preparing themselves. The degenerate West has been baiting the Russians for well over two decades. The attacks, the smears, the lies and hate has increased proportionate to the rise of the Orthodox Church. Let there be no mistake; this is the REAL reason for the hatred of Russia. Even during the darkest days of the Soviet Union one did not see on television, or read in the press about the evils of that Empire. To the contrary: it was excuses, detente, and peaceful coexistence. Suddenly, with the Russians throwing off the communist yoke, with the rise of Orthodoxy, and refusing to bend the knee to Western global hegemony: they are now public enemy Number One.  Ask yourself: who benefits by hating Russia, and Her turn towards a return to the tradition of Her fathers?
 
But the Russians are not fools. Unlike the military-industrial complex with its trillions being wasted on aircraft carriers (floating death traps), and offensively designed weapons such as stealth jets, the Russians have quietly taken a huge lead in hypersonic rocketry. If push comes to shove, the Russians will deliver a knockout punch on the United States and western Europe.  Let us pray it does not come to this. Let us pray that the demoniacs who lust for war in Washington, London, and Brussels are removed from the halls of power. "Blessed are the Peacemakers". Matthew 5:9.

Tuesday, 1 September 2020

May Poland remain Catholic as we commemerate the begining of World War II

 

In the early hours of the morning of September 1, 1939, Nazi hoards began bombing a village of peaceful, sleeping civilians. This attack of barbarians was but the first in an never-ending stream of brutality and war crimes. On the 17th of September the Nazis were joined in the rape of Poland by the Soviet Red Army. Once again, as has been so often the case, Catholic Poland was crucified by godless Christ-haters. 

 


Today, Poland continues in her struggle against the forces of darkness. The enemy is the same, the bases of operation are different. Now, the threat comes from the so-called "democratic" West. Rather than bombs and bullets, the weapons of choice are propaganda, lies, deception, and moral subversion. Covert, and increasingly overt persecution of Christians is becoming the norm. Just the other month the Orthodox Archbishop of San Francisco wrote to the anti-Christian Governor protesting the persecution of Christians in California, and the Governor's adoption of Soviet-style tactics.

Poland is one of the few remaining Nations that has not yet been completely swamped by atheistic materialism. But the enemy never rests and Poland is under constant, vicious attack. 

 


Yes, there are still signs of Polish resistance and public manifestations of defense of Christian morality that are unthinkable in our apostate Nations.