More madness from the IEC in the Philippines: Fr. Mark Francis CSV: the Novu Ordo Mass must be constantly changing

Fr. Mark Francis, CSV, a well-known advocate of liturgical innovations, joined Bugnini disciple, Archbishop Piero Marini in having some interesting things to say at the International Eucharistic Congress being held in Cebu, Philippines. At least he is honest: he wants the Novus Ordo Mass to be constantly changing; you will notice his underlying reason: it is man centred. When it is man centred it has only one result: self worship. 

The Poisoning of the American Mind: Pius XI on capitalism ~ " "free competition has destroyed itself...economic dictatorship has supplanted the free market..."

I may be wrong, but the only prominent American Catholic layman who is ringing the alarm bell on the foundational errors and dangers of the American experiment, is Michael Voris. America is founded on Liberty, not truth, A big, big, capitol error, that has come home to roost. Religion then, comes under the "god" of religious liberty, irrespective of truth. Hence, Catholic truth is put on the same level as protestant error, Jewish perfidy, Islamic infidelism, and even satanism. Everyone has the "right" to religious liberty". A grave error - the halfway house to atheism.  

America is now imploding because of her foundation on Freemasonry and protestantism. The figures of America's two greatest influences loom large: Henry VIII, and the conduit of the effects of his  break with Rome, the philosopher of liberalism, John Locke. It would be from the poisoned well of Locke (though not exclusively) that the "founding fathers" imbibed their philosophy, setting the stage for America's inevitable slow poisoning. 

America's Founding Father: Henry VIII

Let us now briefly review the contradiction between the capitalist system - so beloved of poisoned American Catholics' minds - and the Catholic view of economics. 

Pius XI, (Quadragesimo Anno): 

Yet when the State brings private ownership into harmony with the needs of the common good, it does not commit a hostile act against private owners but rather does them a friendly service; for it thereby effectively prevents the private possession of goods, which the Author of nature in His most wise providence ordained for the support of human life, from causing intolerable evils and thus rushing to its own destruction; it does not destroy private possessions, but safeguards them; and it does not weaken private property rights, but strengthens them.

Furthermore, a person's superfluous income, that is, income which he does not need to sustain life fittingly and with dignity, is not left wholly to his own free determination. Rather the Sacred Scriptures and the Fathers of the Church constantly declare in the most explicit language that the rich are bound by a very grave precept to practice almsgiving.

The ultimate consequences of the individualist spirit in economic life are these: free competition has destroyed itself; economic dictatorship has supplanted the free market; unbridled ambition for power has likewise succeeded greed for gain; all economic life has become tragically hard, inexorable, and cruel. The State, which although it ought to sit on high supreme, free from all partiality and intent upon the one common good and justice, is become a slave, surrendered and delivered to the passions and greed of men. And as to international relations, two different streams have issued from the one fountain-head: On the one hand, economic nationalism or even economic imperialism; on the other, a no less deadly and accursed internationalism of finance or international imperialism whose country is where profit is.

A market unrestricted by any law opens to everybody attracts large numbers to buying and selling goods, and they, their one aim being to make quick profits with the least expenditure of work, raise or lower prices by their uncontrolled business dealings so rapidly according to their own caprice and greed that they nullify the wisest forecasts of producers. The laws passed to promote corporate business, while dividing and limiting the risk of business, have given occasion to the most sordid license. Observe that consciences are little affected by this reduced obligation of accountability; that furthermore, by hiding under the shelter of a joint name, the worst of injustices and frauds are penetrated; and that, too, directors of business companies, forgetful of their trust, betray the rights of those whose savings they have undertaken to administer. 

Restraint enforced vigorously by governmental authority could have banished these enormous evils and even forestalled them; this restraint, however, has too often been sadly lacking.There quickly developed a body of economic teaching far removed from the true moral law, and, as a result, completely free rein was given to human passions.

More to follow...

Archbishop Marini at the IEC 2016: the New Mass "enriched" the Roman Rite; it places "fundamental importance" on the congregation

It was not enough that Archbishop Piero Marini devoted his life to profaning many a Liturgy under the Pontificate of Pope John Paul II. In 2013, this heresiarch opined in favour of legal recognition of "civil unions" of homosexuals. He was not disciplined. 

Now, Marino has turned up at the International Eucharistic Congress in Cebu, the Philippines, to spout his warped view of the Liturgy. The disciple of the Archbishop Bugnini, the creator of the Novus Ordo Missae, certainly had interesting things to say, in his "History of the Novus Ordo Mass" including the following: 

All seemingly enthralled by the speech given by Marini

Then we have this pneumatic presence of Christ inspired heresy (c.f. no.39, Mysterium Fidei) from a Fr. Gustilo. Indeed the crisis of the Church is a Eucharistic crisis. The mystery continues: why would a pope who denounced the Eucharistic heresies in 1965, allow a Mass open to heretical innovations and interpretations to be hoisted on the Church?

The bishops of Alberta join Bishop Henry in resisting the homosexual juggernaut ~ where is the CCCB, where are the rest of Canada's bishops?

Bishop Fred Henry has stood up to the homosexual juggernaut by writing a pastoral letter about the moral unacceptability of "gay straight alliances" in Catholic schools. Predictably, the secular media leapt all over the bishop. I have, and continue to criticize bishops when they fail in their duty, as I did with the cowardly "Election Guide" that failed to even mention the word "abortion".  But I will defend and stand up for bishops who do the right thing! 

I am very pleased to read that Archbishop Richard Smith, Archbishop Gerard Pettipas, and Bishop Paul Terrio have stood up in defense of their brother bishops. 

Archbishop Smith denounced the evils proposed by the government: 

"From this principle stems a number of suggestions for creating an artificial gender-neutral atmosphere in schools, often without proper regard to the rights and protections previously upheld for boys and girls and their mothers and fathers," says the statement.

"The Catholic belief is that the human person is created "body and soul" together (cf. Catechism of the Catholic Church, nn. 362f.), that God created human beings male and female (Mark 10:6), and that we are all called to care for and respect our bodies as they are created."

I call on ALL the bishops of Canada to rise up in rigorous defense of Christ, His Church and Bishop Henry who has proclaimed the truth on human sexuality, on the rights of parents. 

Those bishops who remain silent I have these words: 

Silence is no longer an option. 

Silence means consent. 

Jason Welle SJ ~ just what are you hiding now? ~ how blaspheming, profane Jesuit blocks viewers to his Twitter feed

[warning: this post contains gravely disturbing images and profanity]

Jason Welle, SJ., has a very interesting Twitter feed. Interestingly, a couple of days after this blog and Vox Cantoris made public a few of examples of blasphemy and profanity - we both noticed that his Twitter account is no longer available to the general public. That means that his 1300 odd followers will be the only ones privy to the filth. Apparently the Vox was also blocked. Join the club. 

Notice friends, no apologies, no retraction, no acceptance of his errors. Only defiance and secrecy. Another reason why he cannot be ordained! 

But this action of his means that we are having an effect. Friends, let us continue the pressure upon Bishop Barber and the Jesuit Oregon Province to not permit this man to go through for ordination. 

Tweets are "protected" after the blasphemy and profanity of this Jesuit are exposed

Sorry Jason Welle "EssJay" your evil is out there for all the world to know: 

Please write your concerns to Bishop Barber at the following email: 

bishop@oakdiocese.org

Diocese of Oakland
2121 Harrison Street, Suite 100
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: 510-893-4711
Fax: 510-893-0945

Please contact the Oregon Provincial Superior at: 

Fr. Scott Santarosa, Provincial
Oregon Province of the Society of Jesus
3215 SE 45th Ave.
Portland, OR 97206
Phone (503) 226-6977 

A FULL REPORT: Linda Gibbons found guilty but released with "time served"

Linda and Mary Burnie, shortly after her release

At about 10:10 a.m., Linda Gibbons was brought into Courtroom 504 in Vanier "greens", handcuffed. She smiled, but looked a bit fatigued. It had been the usual two hour, rush hour ride from Vanier on the outskirts of Toronto into downtown Toronto in a Police services van. This time, the heat was left on for the prisoners. Linda was joined by twelve supporters this morning in court. 

At 10:32, the Judge, Mavin Wong, read her statement regarding whether or not  Section 127.1. of the criminal code been violated; that is, disobeying a court order - in this case - the 1999 bubble zone injunction against manifesting any opposition to abortion within a certain distance of given free-standing abortion "clinics".  

Wong began by stating that Linda was an "anti-abortionist", a "dedicated protestor" who was "opposed to legal abortion, sanctioned by law".  Wong stated that Justice Trotter's previous ruling was a "useful template" for her ruling in this particular case, whether Linda had broken the law pertaining to the court order regarding what Wong called the "permanent" injunction.

Wong conceded that Linda's "peaceful leaf letting" did not "intimidate" according to Justice Trotter's ruling. But, she added that she had a different opinion based on the evidence before the court, as submitted by two employees of the abortion killing factory, as well as security guard Joe Coletti's testimony about Linda's comments made to women entering the abortuary.

Wong began to relate some of the testimony of two employees of the Hillsdale murder factory. Wong related that abortion employee, Sarah Workman, had claimed patients were "upset, "disturbed" and had to be "escorted into a small room", when Linda was seen to be outside gently walking to and fro with her little placard. Trial testimony was that it was a busy day, with ten (10), abortion scheduled! 

Another employee, Michelle Hohenberger, had testified that she called security and "urged everyone to stay calm", and that her office work was "interrupted". She then took a number of photos of Linda. 

Wong related that she found the testimony of these two abortion employees "honest, credible and reliable". Wong stated that Workman's claim she was "violated" was reasonable. Wong claimed that this case was "substantially different" from Justice Trotter's ruling; that there was unchallenged evidence that Linda spoke to mothers entering the abortion mill, that Linda was seeking to dissuade women from obtaining an abortion. She opined that Linda should take her street protest to Yonge and Bloor instead, then "we would not be here", she concluded. 

Wong basing her judgment on the testimony of the abortion employees, stated that Linda had a "negative impact" on the clinic, on its functioning, and then she diverted to an old Morgentaler case from the 1990s, where it was claimed that "anti-abortion protestors have a history of being openly aggressive and violent"! Wong concluded that  the "evidence and legal issues [are] completely different" to Justice Trotter's ruling when he found Linda innocent. 

Linda was therefore found guilty "without lawful excuse" of violating the bubble zone law; Wong's focused on several remarks that Linda made to mothers entering the killing factory as further evidence of intimidation. Crown attorney, Daniel Brandes, needed to present Linda's "prior record" before sentencing, hence a twenty minute recess was called. 

Court resumed at 11:20 a.m. The printed judgement complete and Brandes submitting Linda's previous "criminal" record, he then spoke of the clinic's "intense frustration" and that Linda had been "offending for a long time".  Brandeis said her "behaviour is constant and concerted and has been going on for many years". 

He asked for the maximum of six months. Pre-trail credit was given and since Linda had served 141 days, her actual total (given she refused bail) was 211 days, over the maximum sentence. Brandeis then asked for a probation order of two years to be imposed on Linda, to "keep it simple".  Brandes added: "she has a constitutional right to voice her opinion, but the Crown cannot condone her breech of a valid court order". 

Brandes, diverting from the issue of abortion and the bubble zone, effectively moved the issue to a probationary one. He conceded this. In a future trial it would be "cut and dry as it can be for the Crown...make it easier in the future for the Crown to bring the evidence of her wrong doing". Linda's attorney, Mr. Dan Santoro stated that "probation is superfluous", that he could not agree to the terms as suggested by Brandes; Linda's arrest and incarceration was a "political protest case". 

Unfortunately, but predictably, Wong agreed and imposed a two year probation banning Linda from being within 50 meters of a "free standing abortion clinic". 

Linda was shortly afterwards released. It was 11:37 a.m. She was met by her most dear friend Mrs. Mary Burnie, a great and humble servant of the unborn. Linda then embraced her supporters and had a light brunch, before retrieving her belongings and mail from Vanier. The very long and exhaustive day finally ended just before 5 p.m as Linda arrived safely home. 

God bless you Linda! We love you! 

BREAKING NEWS: LINDA GIBBONS IS FREE ~ found guilty, sentenced to six months, but released with "time served"

Today, at the College Park Courts, in Toronto, at 11:37 a.m, Linda Gibbons walked free from the courthouse, surrounded by twelve supporters. 

Linda was found guilty of violating the abortion bubble zone law "without lawful excuse". Justice Mavin Wong sentenced her to six months. However, as Linda had already served 141 days without taking bail, she had, in effect, served 211 days. As such, she was released with "time served". 

Linda was fined $100, imposed by Wong as a "victim impact" fine. After an intervention from Mr. Dan Santoro, her attorney, it was reduced to $5. 

Linda is now home, resting and thankful to all those who visited her, prayed for her and her intentions.

A full report will follow. 

Please continue to keep Mary Wagner in your prayers, as she awaits trial on March 10th. 

Who will stand with Bishop Henry against the homosexual juggernaut? What bishop or priest will take a public stand for the Truth?

His Excellency, the Bishop of Calgary, Fred Henry 

Is there anybody out there? Hello Your Excellency, Reverend father... Yes, I am addressing you! Will you stand with Bishop Fred Henry of Calgary or, will you all allow his words to be fulfilled before your very eyes? Your silence, your cowardice is enabling the "totalitarianism", the "dictatorship of relativism" to grow and expand. 

Bishop Henry has been joined by Frs. Stefano Penna and Mark Sych. Will there be others? The whole hierarchy in Canada should be in an uproar! In an uproar that Canada is being transitioned into a totalitarian State via a soft-shoe shuffle. But, it is not. It is silent. 

Those bishops and priests who will remain silent, do not pretend that you are innocent. No, if you are silent: you are guilty. Silence means consent. Silence is already a decision: a decision not to make a stand, not to oppose evil, not to speak out.  

The other day, a heretic; a strident, noisy, ignorant woman - claiming to be an "educated Catholic" - condemned Bishop Henry. Her ignorance is only out done by her arrogance. Patricia Grell, a "Catholic" school trustee writes: "There were many other things said in Bishop Henry’s letter which I disagree with and as an educated Catholic (sic), I want my constituents to know that I unequivocally disagreed that it should be sent to our parents".

Dear, oh dear. We have a dissenter and a fascist in the making. The two seem to go hand in hand. 

As to being an "educated Catholic", Grell attended that beacon of Basilian "truth" in Toronto, St. Michael's College, University of Toronto, that is so friendly with the likes of the powerful  pro-abortion Sorbara family, as well as former Prime Minister, Paul Martin, who distinguished himself as a fanatical abortion supporter. Follow the money and the dissent and you begin to see why the Church in Canada is falling apart. 

Again,  I ask your Excellencies, Reverend fathers: is it not a tragedy that she is willing to speak out for evil, while the vast, vast majority of you all sit by in silence, unwilling to speak out for the good, for truth? Are you all really that afraid? Or, is it money? Are you perhaps afraid of loosing your money ticket; your tax free status? Catholics need to know if you still have the courage to carry the Cross.