In 1996 President Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act into law, defining marriage for the purpose of federal law and interstate recognition. Obama's 2008 political platform included a promise to repeal the DOMA and as of February 2011 his administration has ceased to enforce the statute or defend constitutional challenges to it.
In Canada, although Parliament passed a resolution in 1999 reaffirming the traditional definition of marriage, same sex marriage became legal with the Civil Marriage Act passed on July 20, 2005. Clearly the legislative attempt to defend traditional marriage was too little, too late.
In both of these cases the previous legislation defending traditional marriage only served to legitimize subsequent attempts to overturn the traditional definition. One has to question the wisdom of bringing the coercive power of the state to bear on this matter. It seems to me that using a big stick to enforce your point of view leaves you wide open to the possibility that someone is going to grab it and smack you with it.
Perhaps its time we recognize that what we do in the sacrament of marriage is so radically different from what the state does that any future cooperation is impossible.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We believe in a good argument. That means NO ad hominem attacks. This also includes Pope Francis. Further, referring to him by any other name, may or may not indicate a schismatic attitude, and given the confusion in the Church your comment will NOT be published. Comments are those of the commentators and not those of this blog. You may use a pseudonym... we do... Behave like a guest in our living room and you will be fine.